Moral considerations in body donation for scientific research: A unique look at the University of Tennessee's Anthropological Research Facility

被引:6
作者
Christensen, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] FBI Lab, Trace Evidence Unit, Quantico, VA 22135 USA
关键词
body donation; forensic science; anthropology; Anthropological Research Facility; autonomy; consent;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00487.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses keys to the moral procurement, treatment and disposition of remains used for scientific research, specifically those donated to the University of Tennessee's Anthropological Research Facility (ARF). The ARF is an outdoor laboratory dedicated to better understanding the fate of human remains in forensic contexts, and focuses its research on decomposition, time since death estimates, body location and recovery techniques, and skeletal analysis. Historically, many donations were unclaimed bodies received from medical examiners (although it will be shown that this trend is changing), and it has been argued that the use of unclaimed bodies for medical or scientific purposes is a violation of autonomy since no consent was given by the individual. It is argued here, however, that the domain of autonomous choice extends to one's own corpse only insofar as expressed wishes are made known prior to one's death, and that in the absence of expressed intent toward final disposition, it is acceptable for institutions to receive donations from medical examiners or family members. This paper also discusses other philosophical issues related to donation, consent and autonomy, and the forensic benefits of research conducted at the Anthropological Research Facility.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 145
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J APPL PHILOS
[2]  
Beauchamp TL, 1989, The Principles of biomedical ethics, V3rd
[3]  
Benson Paul., 1991, Social Theory and Practice, V17, P385
[4]  
Christman JP, 1989, The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy
[5]   Body donation for science [J].
Delmas, V .
BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2001, 185 (05) :849-856
[6]  
DeVita MA, 2000, J CLIN ETHIC, V11, P85
[7]  
Dluzen D E, 1996, Clin Anat, V9, P183, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1996)9:3<183::AID-CA10>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-L
[9]  
FITZGERALD F, 1988, LEGAL THEORY MEETS L
[10]  
FRANKFORT H, 1989, INNER CITADEL ESSAYS