The Impact of Different Touchpoints on Brand Consideration

被引:222
作者
Baxendale, Shane [1 ]
Macdonald, Emma K. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Hugh N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Mkt, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Retailing; Advertising; Integrated marketing communications; In-store communications; Word-of-mouth (WOM); WORD-OF-MOUTH; MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS; MODEL; CHOICE; SALES; CUSTOMERS; ATTITUDES; CONSUMERS; PRODUCT; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretai.2014.12.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Marketers face the challenge of resource allocation across a range of touchpoints. Hence understanding their relative impact is important, but previous research tends to examine brand advertising, retailer touchpoints, word-of-mouth, and traditional earned touchpoints separately. This article presents an approach to understanding the relative impact of multiple touchpoints. It exemplifies this approach with six touchpoint types: brand advertising, retailer advertising, in-store communications, word-of-mouth, peer observation (seeing other customers), and traditional earned media such as editorial. Using the real-time experience tracking (RET) method by which respondents report on touchpoints by contemporaneous text message, the impact of touchpoints on change in brand consideration is studied in four consumer categories: electrical goods, technology products, mobile handsets, and soft drinks. Both touchpoint frequency and touchpoint positivity, the valence of the customer's affective response to the touchpoint, are modeled. While relative touchpoint effects vary somewhat by category, a pooled model suggests the positivity of in-store communication is in general more influential than that of other touchpoints including brand advertising. An almost entirely neglected touchpoint, peer observation, is consistently significant. Overall, findings evidence the relative impact of retailers, social effects and third party endorsement in addition to brand advertising. Touchpoint positivity adds explanatory power to the prediction of change in consideration as compared with touchpoint frequency alone. This suggests the importance of methods that track touchpoint perceptual response as well as frequency, to complement current analytic approaches such as media mix modeling based on media spend or exposure alone. (C) 2015 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 253
页数:19
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Recalling mixed emotions [J].
Aaker, Jennifer ;
Drolet, Aimee ;
Griffin, Dale .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (02) :268-278
[2]   Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment [J].
Ahluwalia, R ;
Burnkrant, RE ;
Unnava, HR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (02) :203-214
[3]   Communication and Promotion Decisions in Retailing: A Review and Directions for Future Research [J].
Ailawadi, Kusum L. ;
Beauchamp, J. P. ;
Donthu, Naveen ;
Gauri, Dinesh K. ;
Shankar, Venkatesh .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2009, 85 (01) :42-55
[4]   Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews [J].
Archak, Nikolay ;
Ghose, Anindya ;
Ipeirotis, Panagiotis G. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (08) :1485-1509
[5]   Affect and Retail Shopping Behavior: Understanding the Role of Mood Regulation and Regulatory Focus [J].
Arnold, Mark J. ;
Reynolds, Kristy E. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2009, 85 (03) :308-320
[6]   The Long-Term Effect of Marketing Strategy on Brand Sales [J].
Ataman, M. Berk ;
Van Heerde, Harald J. ;
Mela, Carl E. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (05) :866-882
[7]   Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising-sales relationship [J].
Bass, Frank M. ;
Bruce, Norris ;
Majumdar, Sumit ;
Murthi, B. P. S. .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2007, 26 (02) :179-195
[8]   How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation [J].
Baumeister, Roy F. ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. ;
DeWall, C. Nathan ;
Zhang, Liqing .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 11 (02) :167-203
[9]   REFERENCE GROUP INFLUENCE ON PRODUCT AND BRAND PURCHASE DECISIONS [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
ETZEL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (02) :183-194
[10]   An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration [J].
Bian, Xuemei ;
Moutinho, Luiz .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2009, 62 (03) :368-378