Comparison of 32P-postlabeling and high-resolution GC/MS in quantifying N7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine adducts

被引:16
作者
Eide, I [1 ]
Zhao, CY
Kumar, R
Hemminki, K
Wu, KY
Swenberg, JA
机构
[1] Statoil Res Ctr, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Karolinska Inst, Novum, Dept Biosci, Ctr Nutr & Toxicol, S-14157 Huddinge, Sweden
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/tx990039l
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
This study compares P-32-postlabeling and high-resolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) in the quantification of N7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine adducts (7-HEG) in DNA obtained from the same tissue samples of control rats and rats exposed to ethene. The samples were obtained from two independent studies. In one study, male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 300 ppm ethene for 12 h/day for 3 days ("Euro samples"). In the other study, male F-344 rats were exposed to 3000 ppm ethene for 6 h/day for 5 days ("U.S. samples"). DNA from liver and kidney from the European study was isolated in the European laboratory, and DNA from liver and spleen from the U.S. study was isolated in the U.S. laboratory. The DNA samples were coded, divided into two portions, and exchanged between the two laboratories. All DNA samples from both laboratories were analyzed with respect to 7-HEG adducts by P-32-postlabeling and high-resolution GC/MS in the European and U.S. laboratories, respectively. However, the U.S. samples were repurified in the European laboratory before the postlabeling analysis. The data from the Euro and the U.S. samples were therefore treated separately in the regression analysis of the P-32-postlabeling versus GC/MS data. The slope of the regression line for the Euro samples was 1.19 (r = 0.97), implying that the GC/MS data were slightly lower than the postlabeling data (one possible outlier was excluded). The slope of the regression line for the U.S. samples was 0.61 (r = 0.94), implying that the GC/MS data were somewhat higher than the postlabeling data. The main conclusion from this study is that there is very good agreement between the P-32-postlabeling and high-resolution GC/MS methods in quantifying 7-HEG adducts to DNA, particularly when identical DNA samples are analyzed and the RNA content is <2%. The paper also discusses the background levels of adducts, the interorgan distribution, comparison between different strains, and exposure conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 984
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   KINETICS AND DISPOSITION IN TOXICOLOGY - EXAMPLE - CARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATE FOR ETHYLENE [J].
BOLT, HM ;
FILSER, JG .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 60 (1-3) :73-76
[2]   HUMAN EXPOSURE TO URBAN AIR-POLLUTION [J].
BOSTROM, CE ;
ALMEN, J ;
STEEN, B ;
WESTERHOLM, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 102 :39-47
[3]  
CASTEGNARO M, 1999, IN PRESS MUTAGENESIS
[4]   UPTAKE, DISTRIBUTION, AND FORMATION OF HEMOGLOBIN AND DNA-ADDUCTS AFTER INHALATION OF C2-C8 1-ALKENES (OLEFINS) IN THE RAT [J].
EIDE, I ;
HAGEMANN, R ;
ZAHLSEN, K ;
TAREKE, E ;
TORNQVIST, M ;
KUMAR, R ;
VODICKA, P ;
HEMMINKI, K .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1995, 16 (07) :1603-1609
[5]   THE CLOSED CHAMBER TECHNIQUE - UPTAKE, ENDOGENOUS PRODUCTION, EXCRETION, STEADY-STATE KINETICS AND RATES OF METABOLISM OF GASES AND VAPORS [J].
FILSER, JG .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 66 (01) :1-10
[6]  
Fost U, 1989, Arch Toxicol Suppl, V13, P250
[7]   NONRANDOM BINDING OF THE CARCINOGEN N-HYDROXY-2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE TO REPETITIVE SEQUENCES OF RAT-LIVER DNA INVIVO [J].
GUPTA, RC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1984, 81 (22) :6943-6947
[8]  
*INT AG RES CANC, 1994, IARC MON EV CARC RIS, V60
[9]   Separation of 7-methyl- and 7-(2-hydroxyethyl)-guanine adducts in human DNA samples using a combination of TLC and HPLC [J].
Kumar, R ;
Hemminki, K .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1996, 17 (03) :485-492
[10]   P-32 POSTLABELING METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF 7-ALKYLGUANINE ADDUCTS FORMED BY THE REACTION OF DIFFERENT 1,2-ALKYL EPOXIDES WITH DNA [J].
KUMAR, R ;
STAFFAS, J ;
FORSTI, A ;
HEMMINKI, K .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1995, 16 (03) :483-489