Proton dosimetry comparison involving ionometry and calorimetry

被引:20
作者
Delacroix, S
Bridier, A
Mazal, A
Daures, J
Ostrowsky, A
Nauraye, C
Kacperek, A
Vynkier, S
Brassard, N
Habrand, JL
机构
[1] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY,VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
[2] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,LOUVAIN,BELGIUM
[3] CTR ANTOINE LACASSAGNE,F-06054 NICE,FRANCE
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1997年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
proton; dosimetry comparison; calorimetry; ionometry; Faraday cup;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00536-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A comparison of the absorbed dose to tissue determined by various ionization chambers, Faraday cups, and an A-150 plastic calorimeter was performed in the 200 MeV proton beam of Orsay, France. Four European protontherapy centers (Clatterbridge, UK, Louvain la Neuve, Belgium, and Nice and Orsay, France) participated in the comparison, An agreement of better than 1% was observed in the absorbed dose to A-150 measured with the different chambers of the participating groups. The mean ratio of the absorbed dose to A-150 determined with the calorimeter to that determined by the different ionization chambers in the different irradiation conditions was found to be 0.952 +/- 0.007 [1 standard deviation (SD)] according to the code of practice used by all the participating centers, based on Janni's tables of stopping powers and a value of 35.2 J/Coulomb for (W-air/e)(p). A better agreement in the mean ratio calorimeter/chamber, 0.985 +/- 0.007 (1 SD) is observed when using the proton stopping power ratio values recently published by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements in Report no. 49, The mean ratio of these doses determined in accordance with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine protocol and using the new recommended stopping power tables becomes 1.002 +/- 0.007 (1 SD). Two Faraday cups agree in measured charge to within 0.8%; however, the calculation of dose is underestimated by up to 17%; compared with ion chamber measurements and seems to be very sensitive to measurement conditions, particularly to the distance to the collimator. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 718
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AAPM, 1986, 16 AAPM
[2]  
BRIDIER A, 1991, NIRS INT WORKSH HEAV
[3]   FARADAY-CUP MONITORS FOR HIGH-ENERGY ELECTRON BEAMS [J].
BROWN, KL ;
TAUTFEST, GW .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1956, 27 (09) :696-702
[4]  
CAUMES J, 1984, J EUR RADIOTHER, V5, P235
[5]  
DAURES J, 1990, B BNM, V82, P28
[6]   FARADAY CUP DOSIMETRY IN A PROTON THERAPY BEAM WITHOUT COLLIMATION [J].
GRUSELL, E ;
ISACSSON, U ;
MONTELIUS, A ;
MEDIN, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (11) :1831-1840
[7]  
ICRU, 1993, 49 ICRU
[8]  
Janni J. F., 1982, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, V27, P147, DOI 10.1016/0092-640X(82)90004-3
[9]  
KACPEREK A, 1991, P PSI C VILL
[10]  
KACPEREK A, 1989, P INT HEAV PART THER