A comparative study of dental arch widths: extraction and non-extraction treatment

被引:27
作者
Isik, F [1 ]
Sayinsu, K [1 ]
Nalbantgil, D [1 ]
Arun, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeditepe Univ, Fac Dent, TR-81006 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cji057
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the pre- and post-treatment width changes in the canine, premolar and molar regions in subjects treated with extraction of four first premolars, non-extraction, and non-extraction with rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Pre- and post-treatment orthodontic study models of 60 females (13.83 +/- 2.77 years) and 24 males (14.33 +/- 2.67 years) who underwent comprehensive orthodontic therapy were evaluated. Forty-two were treated non-extraction with fixed appliance therapy, 15 non-extraction with RME, and 27 with extraction of the first premolars. In addition to standard descriptive statistical calculations, one way ANOVA was used for comparison of the groups, and the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test for comparison of the subgroups. The results revealed that the distance between the upper canines was not affected by the treatment modality. Upper premolar and molar arch widths increased more in the non-extraction subjects when compared with those with extractions, with the greatest increase in patients with RME. In the lower canine area the extraction group showed the widest arch width at the end of treatment. There was also a 0.60 mm decrease in the lower canine width in the non-extraction group. A decrease was found in lower inter-premolar and molar distances due to consolidation of the extraction spaces. When making a decision between non-extraction with maxillary expansion and extraction treatment modalities in borderline cases where there is constriction in the upper inter-premolar distance, apart from taking profile values into consideration, it should be borne in mind that expansion treatment can be helpful in achieving a wider arch form.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
ARCH PERIMETER CHANGES ON RAPID PALATAL EXPANSION [J].
ADKINS, MD ;
NANDA, RS ;
CURRIER, GF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1990, 97 (03) :194-199
[2]
A retrospective study of Angle Class I malocclusions treated orthodontically without extractions using two palatal expansion methods [J].
Azizi, M ;
Shrout, MK ;
Haas, AJ ;
Russell, CM ;
Hamilton, EH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 116 (01) :101-107
[3]
Analysis of change in arch form with premolar expansion [J].
BeGole, EA ;
Fox, DL ;
Sadowsky, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 113 (03) :307-315
[4]
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment [J].
Bishara, SE ;
Ortho, D ;
Cummins, DM ;
Zaher, AR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 111 (01) :18-27
[5]
Dierkes J M, 1987, J Am Dent Assoc, VSpec No, p89E
[6]
Long-term stability of class II, Division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy .1. Model analysis [J].
Elms, TN ;
Buschang, PH ;
Alexander, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 109 (03) :271-276
[7]
GARDNER SD, 1976, ANGLE ORTHOD, V46, P151
[8]
Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment [J].
Gianelly, AA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 123 (01) :25-28
[9]
NONEXTRACTION ORTHODONTIC THERAPY - POSTTREATMENT DENTAL AND SKELETAL STABILITY [J].
GLENN, G ;
SINCLAIR, PM ;
ALEXANDER, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 92 (04) :321-328
[10]
AN ESTHETIC EVALUATION OF LIP-TEETH RELATIONSHIPS PRESENT IN SMILE [J].
HULSEY, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1970, 57 (02) :132-&