Why expected utility theory is normative, but not prescriptive

被引:7
作者
Baron, J
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6196
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0272989X9601600103
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 9
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Baron J., 1994, THINKING DECIDING
[2]  
Baron J., 1985, Rationality and intelligence
[3]  
Baron J., 1993, MORALITY RATIONAL CH
[4]  
Baron J., 1988, THINKING DECIDING
[5]  
Broome John., 1991, Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time
[6]   Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making? [J].
Cohen, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (01) :1-6
[7]   CONSEQUENTIALIST FOUNDATIONS FOR EXPECTED UTILITY [J].
HAMMOND, PJ .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1988, 25 (01) :25-78
[8]   RATIONALITY AND DYNAMIC CHOICE - FOUNDATIONAL EXPLORATIONS - MCCLENNEN,EF [J].
HASLAM, N ;
BARON, J .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 37 (01) :143-153
[9]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[10]  
MCCLENNAN EF, 1990, RATIONALITY DYNAMIC