Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes

被引:319
作者
Fischer, Joern [1 ]
Hartel, Tibor [2 ,3 ]
Kuemmerle, Tobias [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lueneburg, Fac Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Ovidius Univ, Fac Nat Sci, Constanta, Romania
[3] Univ Babes Bolyai, Dept Taxon & Ecol, R-3400 Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[5] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2012年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
CAP reform; community-based natural resource management; Common Agricultural Policy; Eastern Europe; farmland biodiversity; Romania; subsistence agriculture; LAND-USE CHANGE; AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; COMMUNITY; BIODIVERSITY; ROMANIA; EUROPE; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; COLLAPSE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00227.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Many traditional farming landscapes have high conservation value. Conservation policy in such landscapes typically follows a preservation strategy, most commonly by providing financial incentives for farmers to continue traditional practices. A preservation strategy can be successful in the short term, but it fails to acknowledge that traditional farming landscapes evolved as tightly coupled socialecological systems. Traditionally, people received direct benefits from the environment, which provided a direct incentive for sustainable land use. Globalization and rural development programs increasingly alter the social subsystem in traditional farming landscapes, whereas conservation seeks to preserve the ecological subsystem. The resulting decoupling of the socialecological system can be counteracted only in part by financial incentives, thus inherently limiting the usefulness of a preservation strategy. An alternative way to frame conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes is a transformation strategy. This strategy acknowledges that the past cannot be preserved, and assumes that direct links between people and nature are preferable to indirect links based on incentive payments. A transformation strategy seeks to support community-led efforts to create new, direct links with nature. Such a strategy could empower rural communities to embrace sustainable development, providing a vision for the future rather than attempting to preserve the past.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ADEPT Foundation, 2011, AD LOC PROD
[2]  
Akeroyd J., 2007, HIST COUNTRYSIDE SAX
[3]  
Akeroyd J. R., 2011, Contributii Botanice, V46, P57
[4]  
Akeroyd J. R., 2006, NATURE CONSERVATION, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_21
[5]  
Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 23480 EUR EN
[7]  
Baltag G., 2004, SIGHISOARA SCHASSBUR
[8]  
Bengtsson J, 2003, AMBIO, V32, P389, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032[0389:RRADL]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Berkes F, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1251, DOI 10.2307/2641280