Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students' perceptions of their workload

被引:118
作者
David, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Learning Enhancement & Res, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0307507042000190778
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article examines the nature of student workload and how perceptions of it are formed. Inferences are drawn from five detailed case studies, taken from a wider sample of university students who completed an hourly diary for one week. A subsample was also interviewed. Perceptions of workload are not synonymous with time spent studying, but can be weakly influenced by them. There are both class effects from contextual variables and individual differences within a class. Perceptions of workload are influenced by content, difficulty, type of assessment, teacher-student and student-student relationships. Workload and surface approaches to learning are interrelated, in what appears to be a complex reciprocal relationship. It is possible to inspire students to work long hours towards high quality learning outcomes if attention is paid to teaching approaches, assessment and curriculum design in the broadest sense. It is, therefore, important to have open evaluation systems which gather feedback on a wide array of curriculum variables.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 184
页数:20
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING ENV RES
[2]  
Argyris C., 1978, Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice
[3]  
Biggs J.B., 2007, Teaching for quality learning at university, V3rd
[4]  
Biggs J. B., 1987, Learning process questionnaire
[5]   What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning [J].
Biggs, John .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (01) :39-55
[6]  
BRADY L, 1990, CURRICULUM DEV
[7]   WORKLOAD AND THE QUALITY OF STUDENT LEARNING [J].
CHAMBERS, E .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1992, 17 (02) :141-153
[8]  
Eisner E.W., 1991, The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice
[9]  
Entwistle N.J., 1983, Understanding student learning
[10]  
Kelly A.V., 1999, CURRICULUM THEORY PR, V4th