BEHAVIORAL ANTITRUST AND MONOPOLIZATION

被引：14

作者：

Stucke, Maurice E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Tennessee, Coll Law, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS | 2012年 / 8卷 / 03期

关键词：

JEL: L12; L11; L40; L41; L63; D42; BOUNDED RATIONALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; ECONOMICS; CHOICE; EVOLUTIONARY; DECISION; ENTRY;

D O I：

10.1093/joclec/nhs018

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

One hot topic is whether Google has violated the antitrust laws. Another important topic is how behavioral economics can enrich antitrust policy. This article examines two implications of behavioral economics on antitrust monopolization law.The article first discusses trial-and-error learning as an entry barrier. This is timely given the current debate over the entry barriers of the search engine market. The article next discusses behavioral exploitation to maintain a monopoly. The behavioral economics literature can help explain the European Commissions tying claims against Microsoft, why the Commissions original remedy failed, and the benefits and risks of the Commissions remedy involving its subsequent prosecution of Microsoft over Internet browsers.

引用

页码：545 / 574

页数：30