The effect of propofol on human gastric and colonic muscle contractions

被引:45
作者
Lee, TL
Ang, SBL
Dambisya, YM
Adaikan, GP
Lau, LC
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Anaesthesia, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1213/00000539-199911000-00031
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Although propofol is widely used for sedation in the intensive care unit, there are limited data on its effects on gastrointestinal motility. For that reason, we studied the in vitro effects of propofol on human gastric and colonic smooth muscle. Grossly normal human gastric and colonic muscle strips were mounted in an organ bath set-up for isometric contraction and stimulated by acetylcholine (Ach), using a cumulative dose schedule in the absence or presence of different concentrations of propofol [1.7 x 10(-6) M (0.3 mu g/mL) to 4.4 x 10(-4) M (78 mu g/mL)]. Ach led to concentration-dependent contraction of both gastric and colonic muscle strips, whereas propofol, at a concentration 6.7 x 10(-6) M (1.2 mu g/mL) and above, significantly depressed Ach-induced contraction in a concentration-dependent manner for both smooth muscle preparations. In addition, propofol, at a concentration 2.7 X 10(-5)M (4.8 mu g/mL) and above, depressed spontaneous contractile activity of both smooth muscle preparations. Fat emulsion 10% (Intralipid(R)), the solvent for propofol, had no effect on either the spontaneous activity or the Ach-induced contraction of gastric and colonic smooth muscles. Implications: The success of enteral feeding requires a normal gastrointestinal motility. We found that, at clinically relevant concentrations, propofol impaired gastrointestinal contractile activity. Further investigations are required to determine the clinical significance of this change.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1249
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] PHARMACOKINETICS OF LONG-TERM PROPOFOL INFUSION USED FOR SEDATION IN ICU PATIENTS
    ALBANESE, J
    MARTIN, C
    LACARELLE, B
    SAUX, P
    DURAND, A
    GOUIN, F
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (02) : 214 - 217
  • [2] CHANG KSK, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P24
  • [3] GRAY H, 1980, GRAYS ANATOMY, P1136
  • [4] Propofol sedation and gastric emptying in volunteers
    Hammas, B
    Hvarfner, A
    Thörn, SE
    Wattwil, M
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (01) : 102 - 105
  • [5] ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE DOES NOT INFLUENCE POSTOPERATIVE BOWEL FUNCTION - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL, NITROUS-OXIDE AND ISOFLURANE
    JENSEN, AG
    KALMAN, SH
    NYSTROM, PO
    EINTREI, C
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1992, 39 (09): : 938 - 943
  • [6] KEARNEY PA, 1994, CURR OPIN ANAESTH, V7, P305
  • [7] CHARACTERIZATION OF MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS MEDIATING CONTRACTIONS OF CIRCULAR AND LONGITUDINAL MUSCLE OF HUMAN ISOLATED COLON
    KERR, PM
    HILLIER, K
    WALLIS, RM
    GARLAND, CJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 115 (08) : 1518 - 1524
  • [8] Lee Tat-Leang, 1995, J Anesth, V9, P265, DOI 10.1007/BF02479876
  • [9] Effects of propofol on gravid human uterine muscle
    Tat-Leang Lee
    P. Ganesan Adaikan
    Lang Chu Lau
    Ashok Kumar
    Shan S. Ratnam
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 1997, 11 (1) : 71 - 74
  • [10] PROPOFOL INFUSION FOR SEDATION IN INTENSIVE-CARE
    NEWMAN, LH
    MCDONALD, JC
    WALLACE, PGM
    LEDINGHAM, IM
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 42 (09) : 929 - 937