Reassessing the impact of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation

被引:58
作者
Becker, BN
Becker, YT
Leverson, GE
Simmons, WD
Sollinger, HW
Pirsch, JD
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, Div Nephrol, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Madison, WI USA
关键词
cytomegalovirus (CMV); renal transplant; simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant; acyclovir; ganciclovir;
D O I
10.1053/ajkd.2002.32793
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
New antiviral agents and practice guidelines have been implemented to address cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in organ transplantation. We hypothesized that such measures would reduce rates of symptomatic CMV infection, CMV disease, and CMV seroconversion and associated complications in renal transplant and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. We analyzed the impact of CMV in 1,424 renal transplant and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients, transplanted at our center between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1999. Most patients received quadruple sequential immunosuppression with high-dose acyclovir (800 mg four times daily) for 12 weeks as prophylaxis, High-risk patients (donor CMV-positive/recipient CMV-negative) received ganciclovir (500 to 1,000 mg three times daily) beginning in 1998, again for 12 weeks. One hundred and one renal transplant (9.0%) and 40 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (13.4%) recipients experienced symptomatic CMV infection or CMV disease. Donor CMV-positive/recipient CMV-negative patients had the greatest rates of CMV infection or CMV disease (25.2%; P = 0.0001 versus all other categories). The impact of CMV on outcomes was evaluated in a proportional hazards model. Symptomatic CMV infection or CMV disease increased the risk for subsequent rejection (relative risk, 2.11; P = 0.003) and non-CMV infection (relative risk, 2.24; P = 0.001). To determine if the effects of ganciclovir were masked by pre-1998 data, CMV infection and CMV disease rates for ganciclovir-treated patients (n = 62) were censored at 1 year and compared with acyclovir-treated patients In = 287). Ganciclovir was associated with trends toward lower rates of infection and disease. It also delayed the time to infection or disease. Serologic testing in high-risk patients also showed late seroconversion, with 20% of patients seroconverting by 6 months, 12 weeks after the prophylaxis period. These data suggest that despite better prophylaxis strategies, CMV remains an important pathogen in renal transplant and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. This finding may require reassessment of prophylaxis strategies and the development of alternative or novel anti-CMV regimens. (C) 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1095
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] FAILURE OF HIGH-DOSE ORAL ACYCLOVIR WITH OR WITHOUT IMMUNE GLOBULIN TO PREVENT PRIMARY CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN RECIPIENTS OF SOLID-ORGAN TRANSPLANTS
    BAILEY, TC
    ETTINGER, NA
    STORCH, GA
    TRULOCK, EP
    HANTO, DW
    DUNAGAN, WC
    JENDRISAK, MD
    MCCULLOUGH, CS
    KENZORA, JL
    POWDERLY, WG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 95 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [2] A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ORAL ACYCLOVIR FOR THE PREVENTION OF CYTOMEGALO-VIRUS DISEASE IN RECIPIENTS OF RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS
    BALFOUR, HH
    CHACE, BA
    STAPLETON, JT
    SIMMONS, RL
    FRYD, DS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (21) : 1381 - 1387
  • [3] Peripheral vascular disease and renal transplant artery stenosis: a reappraisal of transplant renovascular disease
    Becker, BN
    Odorico, JS
    Becker, YT
    Leverson, G
    McDermott, JC
    Grist, T
    Sproat, I
    Heisey, DM
    Collins, BH
    D'Alessandro, AM
    Knechtle, SJ
    Pirsch, JD
    Sollinger, HW
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 13 (04) : 349 - 355
  • [4] Mycophenolate mofetil
    Becker, BN
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (07) : 2777 - 2778
  • [5] Prophylactic oral ganciclovir compared with deferred therapy for control of cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients
    Brennan, DC
    Garlock, KA
    Singer, GG
    Schnitzler, MA
    Lippmann, BJ
    Buller, RS
    Gaudreault-Keener, M
    Lowell, JA
    Shenoy, S
    Howard, TK
    Storch, GA
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (12) : 1843 - 1846
  • [6] BRENNAN DC, 1999, GRAFT, V2, P74
  • [7] HISTOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF REJECTION BY USING CYSTOSCOPICALLY DIRECTED NEEDLE-BIOPSY SPECIMENS FROM DYSFUNCTIONAL PANCREATODUODENAL ALLOGRAFTS WITH EXOCRINE DRAINAGE INTO THE BLADDER
    CARPENTER, HA
    ENGEN, DE
    MUNN, SR
    BARR, D
    MARSH, CL
    LUDWIG, J
    PERKINS, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1990, 14 (09) : 837 - 846
  • [8] Implication of γδ T cells in the human immune response to cytomegalovirus
    Déchanet, J
    Merville, P
    Lim, A
    Retière, C
    Pitard, V
    Lafarge, X
    Michelson, S
    Méric, C
    Hallet, MM
    Kourilsky, P
    Potaux, L
    Bonneville, M
    Moreau, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1999, 103 (10) : 1437 - 1449
  • [9] Studies evaluating high-dose acyclovir, intravenous immune globulin, and cytomegalovirus hyperimmunoglobulin for prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus in kidney transplant recipients
    Dickinson, BI
    GoraHarper, ML
    McCraney, SA
    Gosland, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1996, 30 (12) : 1452 - 1464
  • [10] A randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients
    Flechner, SM
    Avery, RK
    Fisher, R
    Mastroianni, BA
    Papajcik, DA
    O'Malley, KJ
    Goormastic, M
    Goldfarb, DA
    Modlin, CS
    Novick, AC
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) : 1682 - 1688