26-hydroxylation of ecdysteroids is catalyzed by a typical cytochrome P-450-dependent oxidase and related to ecdysteroid resistance in an insect cell line

The epithelial cell line from the dipteran Chironomus tentans responds to the insect steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone and the non-steroidal analogue tebufenozide by undergoing a morphogenetic and biochemical differentiation program. Long-term culture in the presence of 20-hydroxyecdysone has resulted in the selection of subclones that are resistant to the steroid but respond normally to the non-steroidal analogue. In the present study, several subclones that were resistant to the steroid hormone have been compared with steroid-sensitive subclones with respect to their capability to metabolize 20-hydroxyecdysone. Homogenates of both types of cells, when incubated with H-3-labelled steroid in the presence of NADPH, produced 20,26-dihydroxyecdysone, which was further metabolized to two compounds, which behaved less polar than 20-hydroxyecdysone on reverse-phase HPLC. Ecdysone, a less-active hormone precursor, provided 26-hydroxyecdysone as the only product. The metabolites were identified by mass spectrometry coupled to HPLC, chromatography with authentic samples, and formation of acetonides. The structure of 20,26-dihydroxyecdysone was confirmed by H-1-NMR. The enzyme responsible for the synthesis of 20,26-dihydroxyecdysone in the Chironomus cell preparations has been characterized as a typical cytochrome P-450-dependent monooxygenase. It was a strictly microsomal enzyme, sensitive to inhibition by carbon monoxide and imidazole/triazole-based fungicides, and required NADPH for maximal activity. NADH could partly replace NADPH. The Michaelis constant (K-m) for 20-hydroxyecdysone was 0.96 mu M, and the maximal enzyme velocity (V-max) was 50 pmol substrate metabolized mg protein(-1) min(-1). 26-Hydroxylation of 20-hydroxyecdysone was inhibited by ecdysone, an alternative substrate, and by inokosterone, a product analogue, to 50% at 1.4 mu M and 0.73 mu M, respectively. When various subclones were compared with respect to their in vitro rate of 20-hydroxyecdysone metabolization, those clones known to be resistant to the steroid were 'high metabolizers' (> 70% relative rate), whereas the sensitive clones were 'poor metabolizers' (< 30% relative rate). Hence, it is tempting to conclude that ecdysteroid resistance of the Chironomus cell clones is due to metabolic inactivation of the steroid hormone.