Pilot study of sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by docetaxel for selected IIIB and stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

被引:19
作者
Clark, JI
Kancharla, K
Qamar, R
Fisher, S
Hantel, A
Panganiban, J
Millbrandt, L
Albain, KS
机构
[1] US Dept Vet Affairs, Vet Affairs Edward Hines Jr Hosp, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Cardinal Bernardin Canc Ctr, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[3] Edward Hosp, Naperville, IL USA
关键词
sequential therapy; pilot study; non-small cell lung cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00251-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Vinorelbine, cisplatin and docetaxel are known to be efficacious in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This limited institution pilot study evaluated the novel strategy of sequencing active first line agents prior to progression. The primary objective of this study was to assess the toxicity profile in anticipation of a larger cooperative group standard phase If study. Patients with selected stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status (PS) of I or less and measurable or evaluable disease were eligible. Treatment was cisplatin 100 mg/ml(2) day I and 29, vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) weekly for 8 weeks, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days for four cycles if no progression. If grade IV neutropenia developed, G-CSF 5 mcg/kg/day was used in subsequent cycles. Of IS eligible patients, 17 patients had stage IV disease with a median age of 66 years (range 48-80). Eight patients had a SWOG PS of 1, 10 had a PS of zero. Six of eighteen patients received all 8 weeks of vinorelbine/cisplatin and six of eight patients who went on to receive docetaxel received all four planned cycles; only two patients overall received all planned therapy. One grade III/IV event each of cardiotoxicity myocardial infarction), renal toxicity (acute renal failure), anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred with vinorelbine and cisplatin, and 2 Grade IV hypersensitivity reactions, manifested by severe back pain with docetaxel occurred. Three deaths occurred during the study, all during treatment with vinorelbine and cisplatin: one due to neutropenic sepsis, one from a pulmonary embolism; and one secondary to severe hypoglycemia in a diabetic patient. Of the 16 patients evaluable for response after vinorelbine/cisplatin, there were two complete responses (12.5%) and three partial responses (19%) for an overall response rate of 31% (95% CI 8 - 58). One additional patient who received docetaxel experienced a partial response. Two patients remain alive (21 + and 18 + months, respectively). The 1-year survival was 44%. Conclusion: This sequence, as defined, was tolerated marginally well in patients with advanced NSCLC. Granulocytopenia was the major toxicity requiring dose adjustments throughout the sequence. Based on response rates and tolerability that were somewhat comparable to other regimens in this disease setting, a modified version of this program, adjusted to decrease the incidence of grade III and IV toxicity, was selected as one arm of a recent randomized phase II trial in the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), S9806, evaluating sequential therapy in advanced NSCLC. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 277
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] SURVIVAL DETERMINANTS IN EXTENSIVE-STAGE NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - THE SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP EXPERIENCE
    ALBAIN, KS
    CROWLEY, JJ
    LEBLANC, M
    LIVINGSTON, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (09) : 1618 - 1626
  • [2] ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
  • [3] Bunn PA, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P1087
  • [4] Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: Effects on survival and quality of life
    Cullen, MH
    Billingham, LJ
    Woodroffe, CM
    Chetiyawardana, AD
    Gower, NH
    Joshi, R
    Ferry, DR
    Rudd, RM
    Spiro, SG
    Cook, JE
    Trask, C
    Bessell, E
    Connolly, CK
    Tobias, J
    Souhami, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) : 3188 - 3194
  • [5] DAY RS, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P3876
  • [6] VINORELBINE VERSUS VINORELBINE PLUS CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    DEPIERRE, A
    CHASTANG, C
    QUOIX, E
    LEBEAU, B
    BLANCHON, F
    PAILLOT, N
    LEMARIE, E
    MILLERON, B
    MORO, D
    CLAVIER, J
    HERMAN, D
    TUCHAIS, E
    JACOULET, P
    BRECHOT, JM
    CORDIER, JF
    SOLALCELIGNY, P
    BADRI, N
    BESENVAL, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [7] Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens
    Fossella, FV
    DeVore, R
    Kerr, RN
    Crawford, J
    Natale, RR
    Dunphy, F
    Kalman, L
    Miller, V
    Lee, JS
    Moore, M
    Gandara, D
    Karp, D
    Vokes, E
    Kris, M
    Kim, Y
    Gamza, F
    Hammershaimb, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) : 2354 - 2362
  • [8] PHASE-II STUDY OF DOCETAXEL FOR ADVANCED OR METASTATIC PLATINUM-REFRACTORY NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    FOSSELLA, FV
    LEE, JS
    SHIN, DM
    CALAYAG, M
    HUBER, M
    PEREZSOLER, R
    MURPHY, WK
    LIPPMAN, S
    BENNER, S
    GLISSON, B
    CHASEN, M
    HONG, WK
    RABER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (03) : 645 - 651
  • [9] GANDARA DR, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, P454
  • [10] HANSEN HH, 1972, CANCER, V30, P315, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197208)30:2<315::AID-CNCR2820300202>3.0.CO