Baroreflex frequency-response characteristics to aortic depressor and carotid sinus nerve stimulation in rats

Dynamic cardiovascular regulation depends oil baroreflexes and the processing of sensory information. We evaluated tl-ic influence of choice of anesthetic on the frequency-response characteristics of the baroreflex of fats by electrical stimulation of two major baroreceptor-containing nerves, the carotid sinus (CSN) and aortic depressor nerves (ADN. The ADN contains baroreceptors alone, and the CSN has both chemoreceptors and baroreceptors. Most studies were performed under pentobarbital sodium (PB: 65 mg/kg) anesthesia. We compared this to a combination of alpha-chloralose (80 mg/kg) and urethan (800 mg/kg) (CU). Stimulus trains were fixed at 60-s periods (0.1-ms shocks, supramaximal intensities, 1-200 Hz) and delivered in steady and burst patterns. Unilateral steady- frequency ADN stimulation in PB-anesthestized rats evoked reflex decreases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate that increased with frequencies between 1 and similar to 10 Hz before reaching a maximum. From 10 to 200 Hz, PB ADN reflex responses were sustained at there maximal levels. Cutting the opposite ADN or both CSNs did not alter ADN baroreflex relationships. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure depressor responses evoked by CSN stimulation In PB-anesthetized rats were smaller compared with ADN stimulation and were biphasic, with small plessor responses at 1 Hz. Maximal CSN depressor responses in PB-anesthetized rats occurred at similar to 20 Hz and were sustained at 20-200 Hz. Baroreflex responses far ADN stimulation in CU-anesthetized rats were similar to those in PB-anesthetized rats. In contrast, in CU-anesthetized rats, maximal CSN responses occurred at 20 Hz but declined at 50-200 Hz. Constant- and burst-stimulation responses were equivalent. The results suggest that rat aortic baroreflex responses are sustained even at very high input frequencies (>100 Hz). The sustained high-frequency baroreflex responses seem to present a paradox in understanding central integration because other studies show substantial depression of sensory transmission at the first synapse in the nucleus tractus solitarius at frequencies as low as 10 Hz.