Comparison of bacterial plaque samples from titanium implant and tooth surfaces by different methods

被引:52
作者
Gerber, J
Wenaweser, D
Heitz-Mayfield, L
Lang, NP
Persson, GR
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Periodontol & Fixed Prosthodont, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
biofilm; DNA-DNA hybridization; sampling method; titanium implant; tooth;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01197.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Studies have shown similarities in the microflora between titanium implants or tooth sites when samples are taken by gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling methods. The purpose of the present study was to study the microflora from curette and GCF samples using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method to assess the microflora of patients who had at least one oral osseo-integrated implant and who were otherwise dentate. Plaque samples were taken from tooth/implant surfaces and from sulcular gingival surfaces with curettes, and from gingival fluid using filter papers. A total of 28 subjects (11 females) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 64.1 years (SD +/- 4.7). On average, the implants studied had been in function for 3.7 years (SD +/- 2.9). The proportion of Streptococcus oralis (P < 0.02) and Fusobacterium periodonticum (P < 0.02) was significantly higher at tooth sites (curette samples). The GCF samples yielded higher proportions for 28/40 species studies (P-values varying between 0.05 and 0.001). The proportions of Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythensis), and Treponema denticola were both higher in GCF samples (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively) than in curette samples (implant sites). The microbial composition in gingival fluid from samples taken at implant sites differed partly from that of curette samples taken from implant surfaces or from sulcular soft tissues, providing higher counts for most bacteria studied at implant surfaces, but with the exception of Porphyromonas gingivalis. A combination of GCF and curette sampling methods might be the most representative sample method.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
MICROBIOTA AND CREVICULAR FLUID COLLAGENASE ACTIVITY IN THE OSSEOINTEGRATED DENTAL IMPLANT SULCUS - A COMPARISON OF SITES IN EDENTULOUS AND PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS [J].
APSE, P ;
ELLEN, RP ;
OVERALL, CM ;
ZARB, GA .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 24 (02) :96-105
[2]
ASPE P, 1998, J PERIODONTAL RES, V24, P96
[3]
The microflora recovered from the outer-surfaces of the Frialit-2 implanto-prosthetic connector [J].
Buchmann, R ;
Khoury, F ;
Pingel, D ;
Lange, DE .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (01) :28-34
[4]
Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin [J].
Carlén, A ;
Nikdel, K ;
Wennerberg, A ;
Holmberg, K ;
Olsson, J .
BIOMATERIALS, 2001, 22 (05) :481-487
[5]
Ebersole J L, 1995, Oral Dis, V1, P129
[6]
Gouvoussis J, 1997, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V12, P666
[7]
Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases [J].
Hall-Stoodley, L ;
Costerton, JW ;
Stoodley, P .
NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (02) :95-108
[8]
Microbiological findings and host response in patients with peri-implantitis [J].
Hultin, M ;
Gustafsson, A ;
Hallström, H ;
Johansson, LÅ ;
Ekfeldt, A ;
Klinge, B .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (04) :349-358
[9]
Progressive peri-implantitis. Incidence and prediction of peri-implant attachment loss [J].
Jepsen, S ;
Ruhling, A ;
Jepsen, K ;
Ohlenbusch, B ;
Albers, HK .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (02) :133-142
[10]
Peri-implant microflora of implants with cemented and screw retained suprastructures [J].
Keller, W ;
Bragger, U ;
Mombelli, A .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (04) :209-217