Convolutional Neural Network Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset Can Predict Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score

被引:53
作者
Ha, Richard [1 ]
Chang, Peter [2 ]
Mutasa, Simukayi [2 ]
Karcich, Jenika [2 ]
Goodman, Sarah [2 ]
Blum, Elyse [2 ]
Kalinsky, Kevin [3 ]
Liu, Michael Z. [4 ]
Jambawalikar, Sachin [4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Sect, 622 West 168th St,PB-1-301, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY USA
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE; GENE-EXPRESSION; CANCER; ASSAY; HETEROGENEITY; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.26244
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Oncotype Dx is a validated genetic analysis that provides a recurrence score (RS) to quantitatively predict outcomes in patients who meet the criteria of estrogen receptor positive / human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ER+/HER2-)/node negative invasive breast carcinoma. Although effective, the test is invasive and expensive, which has motivated this investigation to determine the potential role of radiomics. Hypothesis We hypothesized that convolutional neural network (CNN) can be used to predict Oncotype Dx RS using an MRI dataset. Study Type Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study from January 2010 to June 2016. Population In all, 134 patients with ER+/HER2- invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent both breast MRI and Oncotype Dx RS evaluation. Patients were classified into three groups: low risk (group 1, RS <18), intermediate risk (group 2, RS 18-30), and high risk (group 3, RS >30). Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T and 3.0T. Breast MRI, T-1 postcontrast. Assessment Each breast tumor underwent 3D segmentation. In all, 1649 volumetric slices in 134 tumors (mean 12.3 slices/tumor) were evaluated. A CNN consisted of four convolutional layers and max-pooling layers. Dropout at 50% was applied to the second to last fully connected layer to prevent overfitting. Three-class prediction (group 1 vs. group 2 vs. group 3) and two-class prediction (group 1 vs. group 2/3) models were performed. Statistical Tests A 5-fold crossvalidation test was performed using 80% training and 20% testing. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated. Results The CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] +/- 4%) in three-class prediction with specificity 90% (95% CI +/- 5%), sensitivity 60% (95% CI +/- 6%), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (SD, 0.01). The CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 84% (95% CI +/- 5%) in two-class prediction with specificity 81% (95% CI +/- 4%), sensitivity 87% (95% CI +/- 5%), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (SD, 0.01). Data Conclusion It is feasible for current deep CNN architecture to be trained to predict Oncotype DX RS. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:518-524.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 524
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
[2]   Identification of Intrinsic Imaging Phenotypes for Breast Cancer Tumors: Preliminary Associations with Gene Expression Profiles [J].
Ashraf, Ahmed Bilal ;
Daye, Dania ;
Gavenonis, Sara ;
Mies, Carolyn ;
Feldman, Michael ;
Rosen, Mark ;
Kontos, Despina .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (02) :374-384
[3]   Radiomic analysis reveals DCE-MRI features for prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer [J].
Fan, Ming ;
Li, Hui ;
Wang, Shijian ;
Zheng, Bin ;
Zhang, Juan ;
Li, Lihua .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02)
[4]   West German Study Group Phase III PlanB Trial: First Prospective Outcome Data for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Concordance of Prognostic Markers by Central and Local Pathology Assessment [J].
Gluz, Oleg ;
Nitz, Ulrike A. ;
Christgen, Matthias ;
Kates, Ronald E. ;
Shak, Steven ;
Clemens, Michael ;
Kraemer, Stefan ;
Aktas, Bahriye ;
Kuemmel, Sherko ;
Reimer, Toralf ;
Kusche, Manfred ;
Heyl, Volker ;
Lorenz-Salehi, Fatemeh ;
Just, Marianne ;
Hofmann, Daniel ;
Degenhardt, Tom ;
Liedtke, Cornelia ;
Svedman, Christer ;
Wuerstlein, Rachel ;
Kreipe, Hans H. ;
Harbeck, Nadia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (20) :2341-U66
[5]   Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Harris, Lyndsay N. ;
Ismaila, Nofisat ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Andre, Fabrice ;
Collyar, Deborah E. ;
Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana M. ;
Hammond, Elizabeth H. ;
Kuderer, Nicole M. ;
Liu, Minetta C. ;
Mennel, Robert G. ;
Van Poznak, Catherine ;
Bast, Robert C. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (10) :1134-+
[6]  
He K., 2015, DELVING DEEP RECTIFI
[7]  
Kingma DP, 2014, ADV NEUR IN, V27
[8]   MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays [J].
Li, Hui ;
Zhu, Yitan ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
Drukker, Karen ;
Hoadley, Katherine A. ;
Fan, Cheng ;
Conzen, Suzanne D. ;
Whitman, Gary J. ;
Sutton, Elizabeth J. ;
Net, Jose M. ;
Ganott, Marie ;
Huang, Erich ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Ji, Yuan ;
Giger, Maryellen L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (02) :382-391
[9]   A generalized normalized gradient descent algorithm [J].
Mandic, DP .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2004, 11 (02) :115-118
[10]   Breast Cancer 1 MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Morrow, Monica ;
Waters, Janet ;
Morris, Elizabeth .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9805) :1804-1811