Elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel: Formal process and application in animal health

被引:47
作者
Van der Fels-Klerx, IHJ
Goossens, LHJ
Saatkamp, HW
Horst, SHS
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Dept Social Sci, Farm Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Safety Sci Grp, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
formal expert judgment process; probability density function; Delphi; ELI; classical model; animal health;
D O I
10.1111/0272-4332.t01-1-00007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper presents a protocol for a formal expert judgment process using a heterogeneous expert panel aimed at the quantification of continuous variables. The emphasis is on the process's requirements related to the nature of expertise within the panel, in particular the heterogeneity of both substantive and normative expertise. The process provides the opportunity for interaction among the experts so that they fully understand and agree upon the problem at hand. including qualitative aspects relevant to the variables of interest, prior to the actual quantification task. Individual experts' assessments on the variables of interest. cast in the form of subjective probability density functions. are elicited with a minimal demand for normative expertise. The individual experts' assessments are aggregated into a single probability density function per variable, thereby weighting the experts according to their expertise. Elicitation techniques proposed include the Delphi technique for the qualitative assessment task and the ELI method for the actual quantitative assessment task. Appropriately. the Classical model was used to weight the experts' assessments in order to construct a single distribution per variable. Applying this model. the experts' quality typically was based on their performance on seed variables. An application of the proposed protocol in the broad and multidisciplinary field of animal health is presented. Results of this expert judgment process showed that the proposed protocol in combination with the proposed elicitation and analysis techniques resulted in valid data on the (continuous) variables of interest. In conclusion, the proposed protocol for a formal expert judgment process aimed at the elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel provided satisfactory results. Hence. this protocol might be useful for expert judgment studies in other broad and/or multidisciplinary fields of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 81
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Use of technical expert panels: Applications to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis [J].
Budnitz, RJ ;
Apostolakis, G ;
Boore, DM ;
Cluff, LS ;
Coppersmith, KJ ;
Cornell, CA ;
Morris, PA .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1998, 18 (04) :463-469
[3]   Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis [J].
Clemen, RT ;
Winkler, RL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (02) :187-203
[4]  
Cooke R. M., 1991, EXPERTS UNCERTAINTY
[5]  
Cooke R.M., 1992, EXCALIBR INTEGRATED
[6]  
COOKE RM, 1999, P WORKSH EXP JUDG AC, P9
[7]   EFFECT OF CALFHOOD MORBIDITY ON AGE AT 1ST CALVING IN NEW-YORK HOLSTEIN HERDS [J].
CORREA, MT ;
CURTIS, CR ;
ERB, HN ;
WHITE, ME .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1988, 6 (04) :253-262
[8]   Calf and disease factors affecting growth in female Holstein calves in Florida, USA [J].
Donovan, GA ;
Dohoo, IR ;
Montgomery, DM ;
Bennett, FL .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1998, 33 (1-4) :1-10
[9]  
FORBES RN, 1992, NASS PUB, V921
[10]  
Goossens L. H. J., 1998, Journal of Radiological Protection, V18, P249, DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/18/4/003