Is conception delay a risk factor for reduced gestation or birthweight?

被引:10
作者
Cooney, MA
Louis, GMB
Sun, WY
Rice, MM
Klebanoff, MA
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] NICHHD, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Rockville, MD USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
time to conception; time to pregnancy; subfertility; birthweight; preterm; small-for-gestational-age;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00712.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Previous studies have suggested an association between delays in conception and adverse perinatal outcomes, specifically, low birthweight and preterm birth. We investigated the relationship between conception delay (defined as > 6 months to become pregnant) and three perinatal outcomes: low birthweight (LBW; < 2500 g), preterm birth (PTB; < 37 weeks), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA; < 10th percentile weight for given gestational age) using data from the Collaborative Perinatal Project. The study cohort was limited to pregnancies with a known time-to-pregnancy (n = 8465; 15%). Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals [CI] for risk of adverse perinatal outcomes accounting for the clustering of pregnancy outcomes for women with more than one pregnancy. After adjusting for confounders, all ORs were close to the null (LBW, OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.86, 1.20), (PTB, OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.95, 1.27), (SGA, OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.91, 1.25). Thus, we found no evidence to support an adverse relationship between conception delay and decrements in gestation or birthweight among this select sample of fertile women, even after varying the cut-point for defining conception delay.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 209
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abma J C, 1997, Vital Health Stat 23, P1
[2]   REPORTING ERRORS IN TIME-TO-PREGNANCY DATA COLLECTED WITH A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE - IMPACT ON POWER AND ESTIMATION OF FECUNDABILITY RATIOS [J].
BAIRD, DD ;
WEINBERG, CR ;
ROWLAND, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 133 (12) :1282-1290
[3]   STANDARD OF FETAL GROWTH FOR UNITED-STATES-OF-AMERICA [J].
BRENNER, WE ;
EDELMAN, DA ;
HENDRICKS, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 126 (05) :555-564
[4]   A prospective study of early pregnancy loss [J].
Ellish, NJ ;
Saboda, K ;
OConnor, J ;
Nasca, PC ;
Stanek, EJ ;
Boyle, C .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1996, 11 (02) :406-412
[5]  
GNOSH C, 2003, HUMAN REPROD, V18, P1959
[6]  
Hardy JB., 1979, 1 YEAR LIFE
[7]  
HENRIKSEN TB, 1999, OBSTET GYNECOLOGY, V89, P595
[8]   Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: A meta-analysis [J].
Jackson, RA ;
Gibson, KA ;
Wu, YW ;
Croughan, MS .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (03) :551-563
[9]  
JOFFE M, 1993, FERTIL STERIL, V60, P99
[10]   A TIME TO PREGNANCY QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGNED FOR LONG-TERM RECALL - VALIDITY IN OXFORD, ENGLAND [J].
JOFFE, M ;
VILLARD, L ;
LI, ZM ;
PLOWMAN, R ;
VESSEY, M .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 (03) :314-319