Algorithms and collaborative-care systems for depression: Are they effective and why? A systematic review

被引:94
作者
Adli, Mazda
Bauer, Michael
Rush, A. John
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Charite, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
关键词
treatment algorithms; antidepressants; treatment-resistant depression; collaborative care; medical decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment algorithms and collaborative-care systems are systematic treatment approaches that are designed to improve outcomes by enhancing the quality of care. During the last decade. algorithm research has evolved as a new branch of clinical research that evaluates the clinical and economic impact of algorithm-guided treatment in primary and psychiatric care of patients with depressive disorders. Methods: This article discusses the rationale of algorithm development, their risks and limitations, and important elements in their implementation in clinical practice. It further reviews the available studies that have evaluated algorithm-guided treatment for depression. Results: Recent studies show that compared with treatment as usual, the use of algorithms and collaborative-care approaches in the care of depressed patients enhances treatment outcomes by modifying practice procedures and treatment processes. Conclusions: Treatment algorithms and collaborative-care systems clearly increase the efficacy of applied treatments in the care of depressed patients. However, to what extent the enhanced outcomes are a result of diligent measurement-based care or of the specific treatment steps that are used remains to be resolved. Valid clinical or pharmacogenetic predictors of response are needed to further tailor specific algorithms to individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1038
页数:10
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Is dose escalation of antidepressants a rational strategy after a medium-dose treatment has failed? A systematic review
    Adli, M
    Baethge, C
    Heinz, A
    Langlitz, N
    Bauer, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 255 (06) : 387 - 400
  • [2] Adli M, 2003, PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, V36, pS222
  • [3] Effectiveness and feasibility of a standardized stepwise drug treatment regimen algorithm for inpatients with depressive disorders:: Results of a 2-year observational algorithm study
    Adli, M
    Berghöfer, A
    Linden, M
    Helmchen, H
    Müller-Oerlinghausen, B
    Mackert, A
    Stamm, T
    Bauer, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (09) : 782 - 790
  • [4] ADLI M, 2001, 154 ANN M AM PSYCH A
  • [5] Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: A report from the PROSPECT study
    Alexopoulos, GS
    Katz, IR
    Bruce, ML
    Heo, M
    Ten Have, T
    Raue, P
    Bogner, HR
    Schulberg, HC
    Mulsant, BH
    Reynolds, CF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 162 (04) : 718 - 724
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
  • [7] Effectiveness of disease management programs in depression: A systematic review
    Badamgarav, E
    Weingarten, SR
    Henning, JM
    Knight, K
    Hasselblad, V
    Gano, A
    Ofman, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 160 (12) : 2080 - 2090
  • [8] Bauer Michael, 2002, World J Biol Psychiatry, V3, P5, DOI 10.3109/15622970209150599
  • [9] Bauer Michael, 2002, World J Biol Psychiatry, V3, P69, DOI 10.3109/15622970209150605
  • [10] Bech P., 1986, Assessment of depression, P259