Paediatric quality of life instruments: a review of the impact of the conceptual framework on outcomes

被引:185
作者
Davis, E
Waters, E
Mackinnon, A
Reddihough, D
Graham, HK
Mehmet-Radji, O
Boyd, R
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Med Hlth Res, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0012162206000673
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
With an increasing number of paediatric quality of life (QOL) instruments being developed, it is becoming difficult for researchers and clinicians to select the most appropriate instrument. Reviews of QOL instruments tend to report only basic properties of the instruments such as domains and psychometric properties. This paper seeks to appraise critically the conceptual underpinnings of paediatric QOL instruments. A systematic review was conducted to identify QOL instruments for children aged 0 to 12 years, and to examine and compare their conceptual frameworks, definitions employed, and structure. Both generic and condition-specific measures were reviewed. Fourteen generic and 25 condition-specific QOL instruments were identified. Eleven types of definition of QOL and health-related QOL and three theories of QOL were identified. QOL was measured by a variety of domains including emotional, social and physical health, and well-being. Items commonly assessed difficulties, or intensity/frequency of feelings/symptoms, in contrast to positive aspects of life and happiness. The findings highlight the diversity that is apparent in the conceptualization of paediatric QOL and draw attention to the lack of empirical evidence for many of the fundamental assumptions. The impact of the conceptual underpinnings of the instruments on the resulting QOL scores is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 318
页数:8
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]
[Anonymous], MEAS QUAL LIF DEV WO
[2]
ARGLE M, 1996, PURSUIT QUALITY LIFE, P18
[3]
Armstrong ED, 1999, INT J CANCER, P11
[4]
New evidence on the reliability and validity of the pediatric oncology quality of life scale [J].
Bijttebier, P ;
Vercruysse, T ;
Vertommen, H ;
Van Gool, SW ;
Uyttebroeck, A ;
Brock, P .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2001, 16 (04) :461-469
[5]
The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with cerebral palsy [J].
Bjornson, KF ;
McLaughlin, JF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 8 :183-193
[6]
Development of a health-related quality of life instrument for children: The Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children [J].
Bouman, NH ;
Koot, HM ;
Van Gils, APJM ;
Verhulst, FC .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1999, 14 (05) :829-846
[7]
Bullinger M, 1995, EUR REV APPL PSYCHOL, V45, P245
[8]
Norm values for the Generic Children's Quality of Life Measure (GCQ) from a large school-based sample [J].
Collier, J ;
MacKinlay, D ;
Phillips, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (06) :617-623
[9]
COLLIER J, 1997, BRIT PSYCHOL SOC HLT, V28, P12
[10]
DODSON WE, 1994, EPILEPSY AND QUALITY OF LIFE, P259