The origins of eukaryotic gene structure

被引:263
作者
Lynch, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
complexity; gene networks; gene regulation; gene structure; genome evolution; genetic draft; introns; modularity; mutation; natural selection; population size; pleiotropy; random genetic drift; recombination; subfunctionalization; transcription factors; UTR;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msj050
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Most of the phenotypic diversity that we perceive in the natural world is directly attributable to the peculiar structure of the eukaryotic gene, which harbors numerous embellishments relative to the situation in prokaryotes. The most profound changes include introns that Must be spliced out of precursor mRNAs, transcribed but untranslated leader and trailer sequences (untranslated regions), modular regulatory elements that drive patterns of gene expression, and expansive intergenic regions that harbor additional diffuse control mechanisms. Explaining the origins of these features is difficult because they each impose an intrinsic disadvantage by increasing the genic mutation rate to defective alleles. To address these issues, a general hypothesis for the emergence of eukaryotic gene structure is provided here. Extensive information on absolute population sizes, recombination rates, and mutation rates strongly supports the view that eukaryotes have reduced,genetic effective population sizes relative to prokaryotes, with especially extreme reductions being the rule in multicellular lineages. The resultant increase in the power of random genetic drift appears to be sufficient to overwhelm the weak mutational disadvantages associated with most novel aspects of the eukaryotic gene, supporting the idea that most such changes are simple outcomes of semi-neutral processes rather than direct products of natural selection. However, by establishing an essentially permanent change in the population-genetic environment permissive to the genome-wide repatterning of gene structure, the eukaryotic condition also promoted a reliable resource from which natural selection Could secondarily build novel forms of organismal complexity. Under this hypothesis, arguments based on molecular, cellular, and/or physiological constraints are insufficient to explain the disparities in gene, genomic, and phenotypic complexity between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 468
页数:19
相关论文
共 183 条
[1]   Biology of Giardia lamblia [J].
Adam, RD .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2001, 14 (03) :447-+
[2]   A faux 3′-UTR promotes aberrant termination and triggers nonsense-mediated mRNA decay [J].
Amrani, N ;
Ganesan, R ;
Kervestin, S ;
Mangus, DA ;
Ghosh, S ;
Jacobson, A .
NATURE, 2004, 432 (7013) :112-118
[3]   Analysis and function of transcriptional regulatory elements:: Insights from Drosophila [J].
Arnosti, DN .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2003, 48 :579-602
[4]   Mechanism and regulation of transcription in archaea [J].
Bell, SD ;
Jackson, SP .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 4 (02) :208-213
[5]   Exonic splicing enhancers: mechanism of action, diversity and role in human genetic diseases [J].
Blencowe, BJ .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 25 (03) :106-110
[6]   Molecular evolution of eukaryotic genomes:: hemiascomycetous yeast spliceosomal introns [J].
Bon, E ;
Casaregola, S ;
Blandin, G ;
Llorente, B ;
Neuvéglise, C ;
Munsterkotter, M ;
Guldener, U ;
Mewes, HW ;
Van Helden, J ;
Dujon, B ;
Gaillardin, C .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (04) :1121-1135
[7]   The ins and outs of group II introns [J].
Bonen, L ;
Vogel, J .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2001, 17 (06) :322-331
[8]  
Bonner J.T, 1988, The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection
[9]   Comparison of bicoid-dependent regulation of hunchback between Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Bonneton, F ;
Shaw, PJ ;
Fazakerley, C ;
Shi, M ;
Dover, GA .
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 66 (1-2) :143-156
[10]   Genomes were forged by massive bombardments with retroelements and retrosequences [J].
Brosius, J .
GENETICA, 1999, 107 (1-3) :209-238