Effects of species mixtures on growth and stand development of Douglas-fir and red alder

被引:23
作者
Radosevich, SR [1 ]
Hibbs, DE
Ghersa, CM
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Recursos Nat & Ambiente, Fac Agron, Inst Invest Fisiol & Ecol Vinculadas Agr, RA-1053 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 2006年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X05-280
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
In the Pacific Northwest, a mixture of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) often results when red alder regenerates naturally in planted conifer stands. The relationships among stand structure, tree mortality, tree size, and understory development in the two species mixtures were explored at two sites for the first 16 years after planting. Treatments included a range of species proportions, and red alder was either planted simultaneously with Douglas-fir or planting was delayed for 5 years. Red alder was also removed from some simultaneously planted proportions. Both replacement effects (total stand density held constant) and additive effects (stand density doubled) of the interaction were considered. Red alder grew relatively better at Cascade Head Experimental Forest in the Coast Range, while Douglas-fir grew better at H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest in the less temperate Cascade Mountains. Possible production benefits from mixed plantings were examined using two methods of calculation. Potential production benefits from certain planted proportions of the two species occurred at H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest. No planting time or species proportion resulted in yield improvements over monoculture stands at Cascade Head Experimental Forest. Understory species also varied because of differences in site and stand characteristics that resulted from the differences in planting times and species proportions
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 782
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, WEED ECOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ECOLOGY INTERCROPPIN, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511623523
[3]  
Assmann E., 1970, PRINCIPLES FOREST YI
[4]   Facilitation may buffer competitive effects: Indirect and diffuse interactions among salt marsh plants [J].
Callaway, RM ;
Pennings, SC .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2000, 156 (04) :416-424
[5]  
Chan SS, 2003, CAN J FOREST RES, V33, P106, DOI [10.1139/x02-148, 10.1139/X02-148]
[6]   NUTRIENT, MOISTURE, AND LIGHT RELATIONS IN 5-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR PLANTATIONS UNDER VARIABLE COMPETITION [J].
COLE, EC ;
NEWTON, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1986, 16 (04) :727-732
[7]   5TH YEAR RESPONSES OF DOUGLAS-FIR TO CROWDING AND NONCONIFEROUS COMPETITION [J].
COLE, EC ;
NEWTON, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1987, 17 (02) :181-186
[8]  
COX GW, 1979, ANAL WORLD FOOD PROD
[9]  
Crawley Michael J., 1997, P475
[10]  
D'Amato AW, 2004, J ECOL, V92, P450, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00888.x