Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

被引:500
作者
Wibe, A [1 ]
Rendedal, PR
Svensson, E
Norstein, J
Eide, TJ
Myrvold, HE
Soreide, O
机构
[1] Univ Trondheim Hosp, Dept Surg, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Natl Hosp, Dept Pathol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Natl Hosp, Dept Surg, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02024.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Knowledge of prognostic factors following resection of rectal cancer may be used in the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy. This study examined the prognostic impact of the circumferential resection margin on local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival rates. Methods: A national population-based rectal cancer registry included all 3319 new patients from November 1993 to August 1997. Some 686 patients underwent total mesorectal excision with a known circumferential margin. This shortest radial resection margin was measured in fixed specimens. None of the patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: Following potentially curative resection and after a median follow-up of 29 (range 1460) months, the overall local recurrence rate was 7 per cent (46 of 686 patients): 22 per cent among patients with a positive resection margin and 5 per cent in those with a negative margin (margin greater than 1 mm). Forty per cent of patients with a positive margin developed distant metastasis, compared with 12 per cent of those with a negative margin. With decreasing circumferential margin there was an exponential increase in the rates of local recurrence, metastasis and death. Conclusion. The circumferential margin has a significant and major prognostic impact on the rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival. Information on circumferential margin is important in the selection of patients for postoperative adjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
ADAM, IJ ;
MOHAMDEE, MO ;
MARTIN, IG ;
SCOTT, N ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :707-711
[2]   EXTENT OF MESORECTAL SPREAD AND INVOLVEMENT OF LATERAL RESECTION MARGIN AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AFTER SURGERY FOR RECTAL-CANCER [J].
CAWTHORN, SJ ;
PARUMS, DV ;
GIBBS, NM ;
AHERN, RP ;
CAFFAREY, SM ;
BROUGHTON, CIM ;
MARKS, CG .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8697) :1055-1059
[3]   Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer [J].
deHaasKock, DFM ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
Jager, JJ ;
Langendijk, JA ;
Schouten, LJ ;
Volovics, A ;
Arends, JW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (06) :781-785
[4]  
Enker W.E., 1997, RECTAL CANC SURG, P220, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-60514-7_16, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-60514-7_16]
[5]   Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent - Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? [J].
Hall, NR ;
Finan, PJ ;
Al-Jaberi, T ;
Tsang, CS ;
Brown, SR ;
Dixon, MF ;
Quirke, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (08) :979-983
[6]   Mesorectal lymph node dissection:: is it beneficial? [J].
Hohenberger, W ;
Schick, CH ;
Göhl, J .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 383 (06) :402-408
[7]   Long-term results of radical surgery for rectal cancer: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival and local recurrence [J].
Jatzko, GR ;
Jagoditsch, M ;
Lisborg, PH ;
Denk, H ;
Klimpfinger, M ;
Stettner, HM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (03) :284-291
[8]   DEFINITION OF LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER SURGERY FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
MARSH, PJ ;
JAMES, RD ;
SCHOFIELD, PF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (04) :465-468
[9]  
NG IOL, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P1972, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930315)71:6<1972::AID-CNCR2820710608>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-V