Comparative validation of the IPAQ and the 7-Day PAR among women diagnosed with breast cancer

被引：122

作者：

Johnson-Kozlow, Marilyn ^{[1
]}

Sallis, James F. ^{[2
]}

Gilpin, Elizabeth A. ^{[3
]}

Rock, Cheryl L. ^{[3
]}

Pierce, John P. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] San Diego State Univ Res Fdn, 9245 Sky Pk Court, San Diego, CA 92123 USA

[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA

[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Family & Prevent Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY | 2006年 / 3卷 / 1期

关键词：

Physical Activity; Vigorous Physical Activity; International Physical Activity Questionnaire; Total Physical Activity; Moderate Physical Activity;

D O I：

10.1186/1479-5868-3-7

中图分类号：

R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];

学科分类号：

100403 [营养与食品卫生学];

摘要：

Background: The criterion-related validity and measurement bias of the long form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was compared to the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (PAR). Methods: Participants were women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer and enrolled in the ongoing Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study. Women (N = 159, average age 57 years) wore an accelerometer for one week and then completed the IPAQ or the PAR. Results: The validity correlation of the PAR was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the IPAQ (0.73 vs. 0.33, respectively). The PAR and IPAQ overestimated total physical activity by 13% vs. 247%, respectively. The PAR had better sensitivity (p = 0.14) and specificity (p < .01) than the IPAQ (100% vs. 71% and 84% vs. 59%, respectively) in predicting attainment of the ACSM physical activity guideline. Conclusion: The PAR was superior to the IPAQ in terms of validity, measurement bias, and screening statistics.

引用

页数：10

共 27 条

[1]

Blair SN, 1984, Behavioral health: A handbook o f health enhancement and disease prevention, P424

[2]

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].