Is Chinese provincial real GDP per capita nonstationary? Evidence from multiple trend break unit root tests

被引:42
作者
Smyth, R
Inder, B
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Econ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Econometr, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
China; economic growth; structural break; unit root;
D O I
10.1016/S1043-951X(03)00025-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the unit root hypothesis for real GDP per capita in 25 of China's provinces. When we test for unit roots assuming either no structural breaks or one structural break, the evidence supports the unit root hypothesis. With multiple structural breaks, the evidence against a unit root is mixed. When both breaks in the trend function are restricted to the intercept, there is no additional evidence against the unit root hypothesis. However, with breaks in the intercept and the slope of the trend function, the unit root hypothesis can be rejected for just under half of the provinces. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHINAS PROVINCES REF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CHIN WORLD EC DOM PO
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHINAS PROVINCES REF
[4]   RECURSIVE AND SEQUENTIAL-TESTS OF THE UNIT-ROOT AND TREND-BREAK HYPOTHESES - THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE [J].
BANERJEE, A ;
LUMSDAINE, RL ;
STOCK, JH .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1992, 10 (03) :271-287
[5]  
Banerjee A., 1993, ADV TEXTS ECONOMETRI, DOI [DOI 10.1093/0198288107.001.0001, 10.1093/0198288107.001.0001]
[6]  
Ben-David D, 2000, ECON INQ, V38, P320
[7]   The great wars, the great crash, and steady state growth: Some new evidence about an old stylized fact [J].
BenDavid, D ;
Papell, DH .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1995, 36 (03) :453-475
[8]  
Campbell JohnY., 1991, NBER MACROECON ANNU, P141, DOI [10.1086/654163, DOI 10.1086/654163]
[9]   Determinants of economic growth in China: Private enterprise, education, and openness [J].
Chen, BZ ;
Feng, Y .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 11 (01) :1-15
[10]  
Cheung YW, 1996, OXFORD ECON PAP, V48, P134