Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids

被引:121
作者
Koehl, P [1 ]
Levitt, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Struct, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.96.22.12524
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Proteins can he very tolerant to amino acid substitution, even within their core. Understanding the factors responsible for this behavior is of critical importance for protein engineering and design. Mutations in proteins have been quantified in terms of the changes in stability they induce. For example, guest residues in specific secondary structures have been used as probes of conformational preferences of amino acids, yielding propensity scales. Predicting these amino acid propensities would be a good test of any new potential energy functions used to mimic protein stability. We have recently developed a protein design procedure that optimizes whale sequences for a given target conformation based on the knowledge of the template backbone and on a semiempirical potential energy function. This energy function is purely physical, including steric interactions based on a Lennard-Jones potential, electrostatics based on a Coulomb potential, and hydrophobicity in the form of an environment free energy based on accessible surface area and interatomic: contact areas. Sequences designed by this procedure for 10 different proteins were analyzed to extract conformational preferences for amino acids. The resulting structure-based propensity scales show significant agreements with experimental propensity scale values, both for cr-helices and P-sheets. These results indicate that amino acid conformational preferences are a natural consequence of the potential energy we use. This confirms the accuracy of our potential and indicates that such preferences should not be added as a design criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:12524 / 12529
页数:6
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] STRUCTURE OF CHICKEN MUSCLE TRIOSE PHOSPHATE ISOMERASE DETERMINED CRYSTALLOGRAPHICALLY AT 2.5A RESOLUTION USING AMINO-ACID SEQUENCE DATA
    BANNER, DW
    BLOOMER, AC
    PETSKO, GA
    PHILLIPS, DC
    POGSON, CI
    WILSON, IA
    CORRAN, PH
    FURTH, AJ
    MILMAN, JD
    OFFORD, RE
    PRIDDLE, JD
    WALEY, SG
    [J]. NATURE, 1975, 255 (5510) : 609 - 614
  • [2] REFINED 1.8 ANGSTROM CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF THE LAMBDA-REPRESSOR OPERATOR COMPLEX
    BEAMER, LJ
    PABO, CO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 227 (01) : 177 - 196
  • [3] PROTEIN DATA BANK - COMPUTER-BASED ARCHIVAL FILE FOR MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES
    BERNSTEIN, FC
    KOETZLE, TF
    WILLIAMS, GJB
    MEYER, EF
    BRICE, MD
    RODGERS, JR
    KENNARD, O
    SHIMANOUCHI, T
    TASUMI, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1977, 112 (03) : 535 - 542
  • [4] DETERMINATION OF ALPHA-HELIX PROPENSITY WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A FOLDED PROTEIN - SITES 44 AND 131 IN BACTERIOPHAGE-T4 LYSOZYME
    BLABER, M
    ZHANG, XJ
    LINDSTROM, JD
    PEPIOT, SD
    BAASE, WA
    MATTHEWS, BW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1994, 235 (02) : 600 - 624
  • [5] STRUCTURAL BASIS OF AMINO-ACID ALPHA-HELIX PROPENSITY
    BLABER, M
    ZHANG, XJ
    MATTHEWS, BW
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1993, 260 (5114) : 1637 - 1640
  • [6] PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE AND HOMOLOGY BY NEURAL NETWORKS - THE ALPHA-HELICES IN RHODOPSIN
    BOHR, H
    BOHR, J
    BRUNAK, S
    COTTERILL, RMJ
    LAUTRUP, B
    NORSKOV, L
    OLSEN, OH
    PETERSEN, SB
    [J]. FEBS LETTERS, 1988, 241 (1-2) : 223 - 228
  • [7] BOSSA F, 1990, CABIOS, V5, P319
  • [8] HELIX-COIL TRANSITION OF ISOLATED AMINO TERMINUS OF RIBONUCLEASE
    BROWN, JE
    KLEE, WA
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 1971, 10 (03) : 470 - &
  • [9] Chou P Y, 1978, Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol, V47, P45
  • [10] CONFORMATIONAL PARAMETERS FOR AMINO-ACIDS IN HELICAL, BETA-SHEET, AND RANDOM COIL REGIONS CALCULATED FROM PROTEINS
    CHOU, PY
    FASMAN, GD
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 1974, 13 (02) : 211 - 222