Neogene to Quaternary stress field evolution in Lesser Caucasus and adjacent regions using fault kinematics analysis and volcanic cluster data

被引:43
作者
Avagyan, A
Sosson, M
Philip, H
Karakhanian, A
Rolland, Y
Melkonyan, R
Rebaï, S
Davtyan, V
机构
[1] Univ Nice, CNRS, UMR 6526, F-06560 Valbonne, France
[2] Natl Acad Sci Armenia, Inst Geol Sci, Yerevan 375019, Armenia
[3] Univ Montpellier 2, Lab Geophys Tecton & Sedimentol, UMR 5573, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
[4] GEORISK Sci Res Co, Yerevan 375019, Armenia
[5] SIEE, F-34000 Montpellier, France
关键词
collision; stress field; volcanic clusters; Lesser Caucasus; Armenia;
D O I
10.3166/ga.18.401-416
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 [理学];
摘要
In the Great Caucasus, the Lesser Caucasus and Eastern Turkey, the distribution of Neogene to Quaternary volcanic cluster geometries, paleo-stress field data of the Lesser Caucasus area (Republic of Armenia) and the P axes of earthquakes focal mechanisms show the scale and time variability of the stress field since the beginning of the Arabia-Eurasian collision. In addition to the general N-S compression orientation, two other NW-SE and NE-SW secondary orientations are observed. Both orientations were successively significant for some period of tectonic activity. The first one was dominant between the Paleogene and the end of the Lower Miocene and the second one has prevailed between the Upper Miocene and the Quaternary. On a regional scale the principal stress axes orientations are mainly controlled by the Arabian-Eurasian plate convergence and have changed with time. Local stress orientations have been significantly influenced by secondary blocks motions and their geometries. (C) 2005 Lavoisier SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 416
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]
TECTONICS OF THE CAUCASUS AND ADJOINING REGIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE TETHYS OCEAN [J].
ADAMIA, SA ;
CHKHOTUA, T ;
KEKELIA, M ;
LORDKIPANIDZE, M ;
SHAVISHVILI, I ;
ZAKARIADZE, G .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 1981, 3 (04) :437-447
[2]
ADAMIA SA, 1979, IZV ASC SSSR G, P46
[3]
Relationships between volcanic patterns and neotectonics in Eastern Anatolia from analysis of satellite images and DEM [J].
Adiyaman, Ö ;
Chorowicz, J ;
Köse, O .
JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 1998, 85 (1-4) :17-32
[4]
NO-NET-ROTATION MODEL OF CURRENT PLATE VELOCITIES INCORPORATING PLATE MOTION MODEL NUVEL-1 [J].
ARGUS, DF ;
GORDON, RG .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1991, 18 (11) :2039-2042
[5]
Arthaud F, 1998, B SOC GEOL FR, V169, P579
[6]
AVAGYAN A, 1977, IZVESTIA NAS RA NAUK, V1, P94
[7]
AVAGYAN A, 2003, SCIENCE MAR, P13
[8]
Avagyan A., 2001, Estimation of the Sip Rates and the Recurrence Intervals of Strong Earthquakes on the Fault System of Pambak-Sevan-Sunik (Armenia): Segmentation and Relation with Volcanic Activity
[9]
Lower and Middle Jurassic paleomagnetic results from the south Lesser Caucasus and the evolution of the Mesozoic Tethys ocean [J].
Bazhenov, ML ;
Burtman, VS ;
Levashova, NL .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 1996, 141 (1-4) :79-89
[10]
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECTONISM AND VOLCANISM ALONG THE GREAT SUMATRAN FAULT ZONE DEDUCED BY SPOT IMAGE ANALYSES [J].
BELLIER, O ;
SEBRIER, M .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1994, 233 (3-4) :215-231