The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research

被引:34
作者
Abrams, Leah R. [1 ]
McBride, Colleen M. [2 ]
Hooker, Gillian W. [3 ]
Cappella, Joseph N. [4 ]
Koehly, Laura M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NHGRI, Social & Behav Res Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] NextGxDx, Franklin, TN USA
[4] Univ Penn, Annenberg Sch Commun, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
SCALE ANALYSIS; DECISION AID; KNOWLEDGE; FORMAT; IMPACT; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; NUMERACY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0141532
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine how three dimensions of genetic literacy (familiarity, skills, and factual knowledge) fit the hierarchy of knowledge outlined in E.M. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations to better conceptualize lay understandings of genomics. Methods A consumer panel representing the US adult population (N = 1016) completed an electronic survey in November 2013. Adjusting for education, we used correlations, principle components analysis, Mokken Scale tests, and linear regressions to assess how scores on the three genetic literacy sub-dimensions fit an ordered scale. Results The three scores significantly loaded onto one factor, even when adjusting for education. Analyses revealed moderate strength in scaling (0.416, p<0.001) and a difficulty ordering that matched Rogers' hierarchy (knowledge more difficult than skills, followed by familiarity). Skills scores partially mediated the association between familiarity and knowledge with a significant indirect effect (0.241, p<0.001). Conclusion We established an ordering in genetic literacy sub-dimensions such that familiarity with terminology precedes skills using information, which in turn precedes factual knowledge. This ordering is important to contextualizing previous findings, guiding measurement in future research, and identifying gaps in the understanding of genomics relevant to the demands of differing applications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110813203
[2]   Online health communication about human genetics: perceptions and preferences of Internet users [J].
Bernhardt, JM ;
McClain, J ;
Parrott, RL .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2004, 7 (06) :728-733
[3]   Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates [J].
Bowling, Bethany Vice ;
Acra, Erin E. ;
Wang, Lihshing ;
Myers, Melanie F. ;
Dean, Gary E. ;
Markle, Glenn C. ;
Moskalik, Christine L. ;
Huether, Carl A. .
GENETICS, 2008, 178 (01) :15-22
[4]   Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing [J].
Carere, Deanna Alexis ;
Kraft, Peter ;
Kaphingst, Kimberly A. ;
Roberts, J. Scott ;
Green, Robert C. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (01) :65-72
[5]  
Dunwoody S, 2014, SAGE HDB RISK COMMUN, P376
[6]   Consumer Evaluation of Genetic Information Online: The Role of Quality on Attitude and Behavioral Intentions [J].
Dutta, Mohan J. ;
Pfister, Raven ;
Kosmoski, Carin .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2010, 15 (04) :592-605
[7]   The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): A means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics [J].
Erby, Lori H. ;
Roter, Debra ;
Larson, Susan ;
Cho, Juhee .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2008, 146A (02) :174-181
[8]   Using Visual Aids to Improve Communication of Risks about Health: A Review [J].
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio ;
Okan, Yasmina ;
Cokely, Edward T. .
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
[9]  
Geddes J, 2014, TECH TIMES 1205
[10]  
Geibert Robert C, 2006, Nurs Adm Q, V30, P203