Calibration of Xinanjiang model parameters using hybrid genetic algorithm based fuzzy optimal model

被引:48
作者
Wang, Wen-Chuan [1 ]
Cheng, Chun-Tian [2 ]
Chau, Kwok-Wing [3 ]
Xu, Dong-Mei [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] N China Inst Water Conservancy & Hydroelect Power, Fac Water Conservancy Engn, Zhengzhou 450011, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Inst Hydropower Syst & Hydroinformat, Dalian 116085, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Dalian Univ Technol, Inst Water Resources & Flood Control, Dalian 116085, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
chaos genetic algorithm; flood forecasting; fuzzy multi-objective optimization; simulated annealing; Xinanjiang model calibration; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2011.027
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Conceptual rainfall runoff (CRR) model calibration is a global optimization problem with the main objective to find a set of optimal model parameter values that attain a best fit between observed and simulated flow. In this paper, a novel hybrid genetic algorithm (GA), which combines chaos and simulated annealing (SA) method, is proposed to exploit their advantages in a collaborative manner. It takes advantage of the ergodic and stochastic properties of chaotic variables, the global search capability of GA and the local optimal search capability of SA method. First, the single criterion of the mode calibration is employed to compare the performance of the evolutionary process of iteration with GA and chaos genetic algorithm (CGA). Then, the novel method together with fuzzy optimal model (FOM) is investigated for solving the multi-objective Xinanjiang model parameters calibration. Thirty-six historical floods with one-hour routing period for 5 years (2000-2004) in Shuangpai reservoir are employed to calibrate the model parameters whilst 12 floods in two recent years (2005-2006) are utilized to verify these parameters. The performance of the presented algorithm is compared with GA and CGA. The results show that the proposed hybrid algorithm performs better than GA and CGA.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 799
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Estimation of the ARNO model baseflow parameters using daily streamflow data [J].
Abdulla, FA ;
Lettenmaier, DP ;
Liang, X .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 222 (1-4) :37-54
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, P INT C GEN ALG SAN
[3]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[4]   Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos [J].
Cheng, Chun-Tian ;
Wang, Wen-Chuan ;
Xu, Dong-Mei ;
Chau, K. W. .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (07) :895-909
[5]   Using genetic algorithm and TOPSIS for Xinanjiang model calibration with a single procedure [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Zhao, MY ;
Chau, KW ;
Wu, XY .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 316 (1-4) :129-140
[6]   Multiple criteria rainfall-runoff model calibration using a parallel genetic algorithm in a cluster of computers [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Wu, XY ;
Chau, KW .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2005, 50 (06) :1069-1087
[7]   Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Ou, CP ;
Chau, KW .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 268 (1-4) :72-86
[8]   Using a hybrid genetic algorithm-simulated annealing algorithm for fuzzy programming of reservoir operation [J].
Chiu, Yu-Chen ;
Chang, Li-Chiu ;
Chang, Fi-John .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2007, 21 (23) :3162-3172
[9]  
Cooper VA, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V36, P53, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00461-7
[10]  
Duan Q., 2003, Advances in calibration of watershed models