Short-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA

被引:67
作者
Wind, Michael A., Jr. [1 ]
Swank, Michael L. [2 ]
Sorger, Joel I. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] OrthoVirginia, Richmond, VA 23235 USA
[2] Cincinnati Orthopaed Res Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Wellington Orthopaed & Sports Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Pediat Orthopaed, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; STOCK DEFICIENCY; RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; PROSTHESIS; MANAGEMENT; ALLOGRAFT; CEMENT;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20130222-11
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Managing severe periacetabular bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging task. Multiple treatment options have been described. A custom triflanged acetabular component is a recent treatment option. The authors retrospectively reviewed 19 hips in 19 patients with massive periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky types 3A/3B and AAOS types III/IV) treated with custom triflanged acetabular components. Mean patient age at surgery was 58 years (range, 42-79 years). At an average follow-up of 31 months (range, 16-59 months), mean Harris Hip Score had improved from 38 preoperatively to 63 postoperatively, and mean Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index scores had improved from 43 preoperatively to 26 postoperatively. Sixty-five percent of cases were considered successful. Three (16%) patients had significant complications; 2 (11%) custom triflanged acetabular components were removed due to failure. At last follow-up, 6 (43%) of 14 patients reported that their ambulatory status was improved vs their preoperative status, 3 (21%) reported no change, and 5 (36%) reported that their ambulatory status was worse than their preoperative status. In this study, the use of a custom triflanged acetabular component for massive periacetabular bone loss in revision THA had less favorable results than in other reports. Use of a custom triflanged acetabular component for massive periacetabular bone loss in revision THA remains a viable option, but surgeon and patient expectations should be realistic.
引用
收藏
页码:E260 / E265
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Berry DJ, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P106
[2]
Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency [J].
Chen, WM ;
Engh, CA ;
Hopper, RH ;
McAuley, JP ;
Engh, CA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (02) :197-206
[3]
Christie MJ, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P216
[4]
DANTONIO JA, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P126
[5]
High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty - Results after a mean of ten years [J].
Dearborn, JT ;
Harris, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) :469-480
[6]
Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis - Three- to seven-year results [J].
DeBoer, DK ;
Christie, MJ .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (06) :674-680
[7]
Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft - Study with a minimum five-year follow-up [J].
Garbuz, D ;
Morsi, E ;
Gross, AE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (05) :693-697
[8]
Rebuilding the skeleton - The intraoperative use of trabecular metal in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Gross, AE ;
Goodman, SB .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (04) :91-93
[9]
The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip [J].
Gross, AE ;
Goodman, S .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (429) :193-200
[10]
Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Holt, GE ;
Dennis, DA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (429) :209-214