Paying for loyalty: Product bundling in oligopoly

被引:52
作者
Gans, JS
King, SP
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Business, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Australian Competit & Consumer Commiss, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6451.2006.00275.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In recent times, pairs of retailers such as supermarket and retail gasoline chains have offered bundled discounts to customers who buy their respective product brands. These discounts are a fixed amount off the headline prices that allied brands continue to set independently. We show that a pair of firms can profit from offering a bundled discount to the detriment of other firms and consumers whose preferences are farther removed from the bundled brands. Indeed, when both pairs of firms negotiate bundling arrangements, there are no beneficiaries and consumers simply find themselves consuming a sub-optimal brand mix.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 62
页数:20
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   COMMODITY BUNDLING AND BURDEN OF MONOPOLY [J].
ADAMS, WJ ;
YELLEN, JL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 90 (03) :475-498
[2]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR EC REV
[3]  
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2004, ASS SHOPP DOCK PETR
[4]  
Barreto GP, 2001, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V30, P1
[5]   ENDOGENOUS SWITCHING COSTS IN A DUOPOLY MODEL [J].
CAMINAL, R ;
MATUTES, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1990, 8 (03) :353-373
[6]   A STRATEGIC MOTIVATION FOR COMMODITY BUNDLING [J].
CARBAJO, J ;
DEMEZA, D ;
SEIDMANN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 38 (03) :283-298
[7]   Equilibrium product bundling [J].
Chen, YM .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1997, 70 (01) :85-103
[8]  
Denicolò V, 2000, J IND ECON, V48, P177
[9]   COMPETITION AND INTEGRATION AMONG COMPLEMENTS, AND NETWORK MARKET-STRUCTURE [J].
ECONOMIDES, N ;
SALOP, SC .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 40 (01) :105-123
[10]   COMPATIBILITY AND BUNDLING OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS IN A DUOPOLY [J].
MATUTES, C ;
REGIBEAU, P .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 40 (01) :37-54