Allometry and resolution of bee eyes (Apoidea)

被引:116
作者
Jander, U [1 ]
Jander, R
机构
[1] Washburn Univ, Dept Biol, Topeka, KS 66621 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Entomol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
allometry; Apoidea; compound eye; visual resolution; macro-evolution;
D O I
10.1016/S1467-8039(01)00035-4
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
A sample of compound eyes from 15 species of female pollen foraging bees (apiform Apoidea) was morphometrically analyzed. These species were chosen for size differences, different social organization, and a wide geographic and taxonomic distribution (Apidae, Megachilidae, Andrenidae. Halictidae). The results demonstrate the following characteristics for the typical compound eye in female foraging bees: (1) the vertical diameter of the eye is about twice the horizontal diameter; (2) the eyes of diurnal foragers scale isometrically with body size; (3) the eyes of three species of nocturnal foragers have about 1.8 times the surface area as compared to diurnal foragers of matching size; (4) the number of ommatidia per eye range from about 1000 in Perdita minima to about 16 000 in Xhlocopa latipes; and (5) the corresponding mean interommatidial angles range from 4.7 to 1.2degrees. Body size, rather than species-specific ecological adaptation, is the major (97%) determinant of the number of ommatidia per eye in diurnal, as well as nocturnal foragers. The number of ommatidia per eye, and hence the visual resolution, is proportional to the square root of both body size and eye size across all species studied. The eye parameter (the product of the mean interommatidial angle and the mean lens diameter) increases slightly with decreasing body size. All this is taken as evidence that the features of the bees' visual macro-niche remained largely constant over the roughly 130 million years of their macro-evolution. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 193
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Alexander B.A., 1992, Journal of Hymenoptera Research, V1, P25
[2]  
Alexander Byron A., 1995, University of Kansas Science Bulletin, V55, P377
[3]  
AUTRUM H, 1962, Z NATURFORSCH PT B, VB 17, P480
[4]  
BARLOW HB, 1952, J EXP BIOL, V29, P667
[5]  
BARR THOMAS C., 1968, P35
[6]   MORPHOLOGY OF THE COMPOUND EYES AS AN INDICATOR OF LIFE-STYLE IN CARABID BEETLES [J].
BAUER, T ;
KREDLER, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1993, 71 (04) :799-810
[7]  
BAUMGARTNER HERBERT, 1928, ZEITSCHR WISSENSCH BIOL ABT C ZEITSCHR VERGLEICH PHYSIOL, V7, P56, DOI 10.1007/BF00341153
[8]   Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication [J].
Bennet-Clark, HC .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 353 (1367) :407-419
[9]   Body size and reproductive success of drones (Apis mellifera L) [J].
Berg, S ;
Koeniger, N ;
Koeniger, G ;
Fuchs, S .
APIDOLOGIE, 1997, 28 (06) :449-460
[10]   The scaling of eye size with body mass in birds [J].
Brooke, MD ;
Hanley, S ;
Laughlin, SB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1417) :405-412