EXACT REGULARIZATION OF CONVEX PROGRAMS

被引:73
作者
Friedlander, Michael P. [1 ]
Tseng, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Comp Sci, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Math, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
convex program; conic program; linear program; regularization; exact penalization; Lagrange multiplier; degeneracy; sparse solutions; interior-point algorithms;
D O I
10.1137/060675320
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The regularization of a convex program is exact if all solutions of the regularized problem are also solutions of the original problem for all values of the regularization parameter below some positive threshold. For a general convex program, we show that the regularization is exact if and only if a certain selection problem has a Lagrange multiplier. Moreover, the regularization parameter threshold is inversely related to the Lagrange multiplier. We use this result to generalize an exact regularization result of Ferris and Mangasarian [Appl. Math. Optim., 23 (1991), pp. 266-273] involving a linearized selection problem. We also use it to derive necessary and sufficient conditions for exact penalization, similar to those obtained by Bertsekas [Math. Programming, 9 (1975), pp. 87-99] and by Bertsekas, Nedic, and Ozdaglar [Convex Analysis and Optimization, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA, 2003]. When the regularization is not exact, we derive error bounds on the distance from the regularized solution to the original solution set. We also show that existence of a "weak sharp minimum" is in some sense close to being necessary for exact regularization. We illustrate the main result with numerical experiments on the l(1) regularization of benchmark (degenerate) linear programs and semidefinite/second-order cone programs. The experiments demonstrate the usefulness of l(1) regularization in finding sparse solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1326 / 1350
页数:25
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Regularized symmetric indefinite systems in interior point methods for linear and quadratic optimization [J].
Altman, A ;
Gondzio, J .
OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 1999, 11-2 (1-4) :275-302
[2]  
BACH F, 2005, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, V17
[3]  
BENTAL A, 2001, MPS SIAM SER OPTIM, V2
[4]  
Bertsekas D., 2019, Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Control
[5]  
Bertsekas D, 2003, Convex Analysis and Optimization, V1
[6]   A note on error bounds for convex and nonconvex programs [J].
Bertsekas, DP .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 12 (1-3) :41-51
[7]   NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR A PENALTY METHOD TO BE EXACT [J].
BERTSEKAS, DP .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1975, 9 (01) :87-99
[8]  
Boyd S., 2004, CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
[9]   Weak sharp minima revisited, part II: application to linear regularity and error bounds [J].
Burke, JV ;
Deng, S .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2005, 104 (2-3) :235-261
[10]   WEAK SHARP MINIMA IN MATHEMATICAL-PROGRAMMING [J].
BURKE, JV ;
FERRIS, MC .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 1993, 31 (05) :1340-1359