Hemispatial neglect - Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability

被引:452
作者
Buxbaum, LJ
Ferraro, MK
Veramonti, T
Farne, A
Whyte, J
Ladavas, E
Frassinetti, F
Coslett, HB
机构
[1] Moss Rehabil Res Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Psicol, Ctr Neurosci Cognit, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.WNL.0000113730.73031.F4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the relative frequency of occurrence of motor, perceptual, peripersonal, and personal neglect subtypes, the association of neglect and other related deficits ( e. g., deficient nonlateralized attention, anosognosia), and the neuroanatomic substrates of neglect in patients with right hemisphere stroke in rehabilitation settings. Methods: The authors assessed 166 rehabilitation inpatients and outpatients with right hemisphere stroke with measures of neglect and neglect subtypes, attention, motor and sensory function, functional disability, and family burden. Detailed lesion analyses were also performed. Results: Neglect was present in 48% of right hemisphere stroke patients. Patients with neglect had more motor impairment, sensory dysfunction, visual extinction, basic ( nonlateralized) attention deficit, and anosognosia than did patients without neglect. Personal neglect occurred in 1% and peripersonal neglect in 27%, motor neglect in 17%, and perceptual neglect in 21%. Neglect severity predicted scores on the Functional Independence Measure and Family Burden Questionnaire more accurately than did number of lesioned regions. Conclusions: The neglect syndrome per se, rather than overall stroke severity, predicts poor outcome in right hemisphere stroke. Dissociations between tasks assessing neglect subtypes support the existence of these subtypes. Finally, neglect results from lesions at various loci within a distributed system mediating several aspects of attention and spatiomotor performance.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 756
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Anosognosia for hemiplegia: Test of the personal neglect hypothesis [J].
Adair, JC ;
Na, DL ;
Schwartz, RL ;
Fennell, EM ;
Gilmore, RL ;
Heilman, KM .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (12) :2195-2199
[2]   Analysis of primary and secondary influences on spatial neglect [J].
Adair, JC ;
Na, DL ;
Schwartz, RL ;
Heilman, KM .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1998, 37 (03) :351-367
[3]   UNILATERAL NEGLECT - PERSONAL AND EXTRA-PERSONAL [J].
BISIACH, E ;
PERANI, D ;
VALLAR, G ;
BERTI, A .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1986, 24 (06) :759-767
[4]   PERCEPTUAL AND PREMOTOR FACTORS OF UNILATERAL NEGLECT [J].
BISIACH, E ;
GEMINIANI, G ;
BERTI, A ;
RUSCONI, ML .
NEUROLOGY, 1990, 40 (08) :1278-1281
[5]   Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke [J].
Bowen, A ;
McKenna, K ;
Tallis, RC .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (06) :1196-1202
[6]   Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Coslett, HB ;
Montgomery, MW ;
Farah, MJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (02) :113-126
[7]   Hand-centered attentional and motor asymmetries in unilateral neglect [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Permaul, P .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2001, 39 (07) :653-664
[8]   The association of visual field deficits and visuo-spatial neglect in acute right-hemisphere stroke patients [J].
Cassidy, TP ;
Bruce, DW ;
Lewis, S ;
Gray, CS .
AGE AND AGEING, 1999, 28 (03) :257-260
[9]   The Fluff Test: A simple task to assess body representation neglect [J].
Cocchini, G ;
Beschin, N ;
Jehkonen, M .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 11 (01) :17-31
[10]   REDUCTION IN CEREBRAL ACTIVATION AFTER RIGHT-HEMISPHERE STROKE [J].
COSLETT, HB ;
BOWERS, D ;
HEILMAN, KM .
NEUROLOGY, 1987, 37 (06) :957-962