Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly

被引:61
作者
Ohori, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
关键词
environmental policy; international trade; privatization;
D O I
10.1007/s11149-006-6037-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopolistic market. We show that when the government is able to control the environmental tax and the extent of privatization, the optimal environmental tax is lower than the standard Pigouvian level. We also show that the optimal level of privatization of state-owned enterprises is partial privatization. Further, the optimal level of privatization is inversely dependent on the cleanup cost of past environmental contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 233
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Anderson GD., 1999, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V4, P413, DOI [10.1017/S1355770X99000273, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X99000273]
[2]  
Auer M R., 2001, The Journal of Environment and Development, V10, P5
[3]  
BARNETT AH, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P1037
[4]   STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL-TRADE [J].
BARRETT, S .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1994, 54 (03) :325-338
[5]   Environmental liability and privatization in central and Eastern Europe: Toward an optimal policy [J].
Bluffstone, RA ;
Panayotou, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (04) :335-352
[6]   Retroactive liability or the public purse? [J].
Boyd, J ;
Kunreuther, H .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1997, 11 (01) :79-90
[7]  
BOYD J, 1996, EUROPEAN J LAW EC, V3, P39
[8]   EXPORT SUBSIDIES AND INTERNATIONAL MARKET SHARE RIVALRY [J].
BRANDER, JA ;
SPENCER, BJ .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 18 (1-2) :83-100
[9]   MULTIMARKET OLIGOPOLY - STRATEGIC SUBSTITUTES AND COMPLEMENTS [J].
BULOW, JI ;
GEANAKOPLOS, JD ;
KLEMPERER, PD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1985, 93 (03) :488-511
[10]   Trade liberalization, environmental policy, and welfare [J].
Burguet, R ;
Sempere, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (01) :25-37