Prospective randomized trial of HDR brachytherapy as a sole modality in palliation of advanced esophageal carcinoma - An International Atomic Energy Agency Study

被引:106
作者
Sur, RK
Levin, CV
Donde, B
Sharma, V
Miszczyk, L
Nag, S
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] IAEA, Vienna, Austria
[3] Tata Mem Hosp, Bombay 400012, Maharashtra, India
[4] Inst Oncol, Gliwice, Poland
[5] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2002年 / 53卷 / 01期
关键词
esophageal cancer; brachytherapy; palliation; high-dose-rate; complications;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02702-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies from South Africa have established that fractionated high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy gives the best results in terms of palliation and survival in advanced esophageal cancer. A multicenter, prospective randomized study was therefore conducted under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency to evaluate two HDR regimens. Methods and Materials: Surgically inoperable patients with histologically proven squamous cell cancer of the esophagus, tumor >5 cm in length on barium swallow and/or endoscopy, Karnofsky performance score >50, age 17-70 years, primary, disease in the thoracic esophagus, no prior malignancy within the past 5 years, and any N or M status were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included cervical esophagus location, tumor extending <1 cm from the gastroesophageal junction, tracheoesophageal fistula, Karnofsky performance score <50, altered mental status, and extension to great vessels on CT. Patients were randomized to receive 18 Gy in 3 fractions on alternate days (6 Gy per fraction, Group A) or 16 Gy in 2 fractions on alternate days (8 Gy per fraction, Group 13). The HDR dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the center of the source axis after dose optimization. A margin of 2 cm was included proximally and distally. The respective hospital and university committees gave approval for the study, and all patients provided informed consent. Results: A total of 232 patients were entered into the study (112 in Group A and 120 in Group B). There was no difference between the groups for any of the prognostic variables. All patients were followed until death. The dysphagia-free survival for the whole group was 7.1 months (Group A, 7.8 months; Group B, 6.3 months; p >0.05). The overall survival was 7.9 months for the whole group (Group A, 9.1 months; Group B, 6.9 months; p >0.05). On univariate analysis, the presenting weight (p = 0.0083), gender (p = 0.0038), race (p = 0.0105). the presenting dysphagia score (p = 0.0083), the treatment center (p = 0.0029), and tumor grade (P = 0.0029) had an impact on the dysphagia-free survival, and gender (p = 0.0011) and performance score (p = 0.0060) had an impact on dysphagia-free survival on multivariate analysis. Only age had an impact on overall survival on both univariate (p = 0.0430) and multivariate (p = 0.0331) analysis. The incidence of strictures (Group A, n = 12; Group B, n = 13; p >0.05) and fistulas (Group A, n = 11; Group B, it = 12; p >0.05) was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Fractionated HDR brachytherapy alone is an effective method of palliating advanced esophageal cancers, surpassing the results of any other modality of treatment presently available. Dose fractions of 6 Gy X 3 and 8 Gy X 2 give similar results for dysphagia-free survival, overall survival, strictures, and fistulas and are equally effective in palliation of advanced esophageal cancer. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BERRY B, 1989, CANCER, V64, P1833, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19891101)64:9<1833::AID-CNCR2820640913>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-U
[3]   Is combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy equally effective as surgical resection in localized esophageal carcinoma? [J].
Chan, A ;
Wong, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (02) :265-270
[4]  
Gaspar LE, 2000, CANCER, V88, P988, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<988::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-U
[6]   Impact on survival of surgery after concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cancers of the esophagus [J].
Hennequin, C ;
Gayet, B ;
Sauvanet, A ;
Blazy, A ;
Perniceni, T ;
Panis, Y ;
Mal, F ;
Sarfati, E ;
Valleur, P ;
Belghiti, J ;
Fekete, F ;
Maylin, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03) :657-664
[7]  
Kulhavy M, 1995, ENDOCURIETHERHYPERTH, V11, P235
[8]   Comparison between chemoradiation protocol intended for organ preservation and conventional surgery for clinical T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma [J].
Murakami, M ;
Kuroda, Y ;
Nakajima, T ;
Okamoto, Y ;
Mizowaki, T ;
Kusumi, F ;
Hajiro, K ;
Nishimura, S ;
Matsusue, S ;
Takeda, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (02) :277-284
[9]  
PETERSON AT, 1996, ENDOCURIETHER HYPERT, V12, P225
[10]   Combined chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone for early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [J].
Smith, TJ ;
Ryan, LM ;
Douglass, HO ;
Haller, DG ;
Dayal, Y ;
Kirkwood, J ;
Tormey, DC ;
Schutt, AJ ;
Hinson, J ;
Sischy, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :269-276