Development of a work addiction scale

被引:227
作者
Andreassen, Cecilie Schou [1 ,2 ]
Griffiths, Mark D. [3 ]
Hetland, Jorn [1 ]
Pallesen, Stale [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Psychosocial Sci, NO-5015 Bergen, Norway
[2] Bergen Clin Fdn, Bergen, Norway
[3] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Social Sci, Nottingham, England
关键词
Assessment; psychometrics; scale; work addiction; workaholism; RISK TEST; WORKAHOLISM BATTERY; VALIDITY; CONSEQUENCES; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; EMPLOYEES; DISEASE; VERSION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
010107 [宗教学];
摘要
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J. & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 265272. Research into excessive work has gained increasing attention over the last 20 years. Terms such as workaholism,work addiction and excessive work have been used interchangeably. Given the increase in empirical research, this study presents the development of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale (BWAS), a new psychometrically validated scale for the assessment of work addiction. A pool of 14 items, with two reflecting each of seven core elements of addiction (i.e., salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, relapse, and problems) was initially constructed. The items were then administered to two samples, one recruited by a web survey following a television broadcast about workaholism (n = 11,769) and one comprising participants in the second wave of a longitudinal internet-based survey about working life (n = 368). The items with the highest corrected item-total correlation from within each of the seven addiction elements were retained in the final scale. The assumed one-factor solution of the refined seven-item scale was acceptable (root mean square error of approximation = 0.077, Comparative Fit Index = 0.96, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.95) and the internal reliability of the two samples were 0.84 and 0.80, respectively. The scores of the BWAS converged with scores on other workaholism scales, except for a Work Enjoyment subscale. A suggested cut-off for categorization of workaholics showed good discriminative ability in terms of working hours, leadership position, and subjective health complaints. It is concluded that the BWAS has good psychometric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 272
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[2]
Anastasi A., 1997, Psychological testing, V7st ed
[3]
'Workaholism' and Potential Outcomes in Well-Being and Health in a Cross-Occupational Sample [J].
Andreassen, Cecilie Schou ;
Hetland, Jorn ;
Molde, Helge ;
Pallesen, Stale .
STRESS AND HEALTH, 2011, 27 (03) :E209-E214
[4]
The Relationship Between 'Workaholism', Basic Needs Satisfaction at Work and Personality [J].
Andreassen, Cecilie Schou ;
Hetland, Jorn ;
Pallesen, Stale .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2010, 24 (01) :3-17
[5]
[Anonymous], 1999, GAMBLING IMPACT BEHA
[6]
[Anonymous], 1994, AM PSYCHIATR ASSOC
[7]
Cozby P.C., 2009, Methods in Behavioral Research, V10th
[8]
del Líbano M, 2010, PSICOTHEMA, V22, P143
[9]
A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC) [J].
Eriksen, HR ;
Ihlebaek, C ;
Ursin, H .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 27 (01) :63-72
[10]
A structural and discriminant analysis of the work addiction risk test [J].
Flowers, CP ;
Robinson, B .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 62 (03) :517-526