Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites

被引:209
作者
Meric, F
Bernstam, EV
Mirza, NQ
Hunt, KK
Ames, FC
Ross, MI
Kuerer, HM
Pollock, RE
Musen, MA
Singletary, SE
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Sect Breast Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Hlth Informat Sci, Houston, TX USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2002年 / 324卷 / 7337期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the characteristics of popular breast cancer related websites and whether more popular sites are of higher quality. Design The search engine Google was used to generate a list of websites about breast cancer. Google ranks search results by measures of link popularity-the number of links to a site from other sites. The top 200 sites returned in response to the query "breast cancer" were divided into "more popular" and "less popular" subgroups by three different measures of link popularity: Google rank and number of links reported independently by Google and by AltaVista (another search engine). Main outcome measures Type and quality of content Results More popular sites according to Google rank were more likely than less popular ones to contain information on ongoing clinical trials (27% v 12%, P=0.01), results of trials (12% v 3%, P=0.02), and opportunities for psychosocial adjustment (48% v 23%, P < 0.01). These characteristics were also associated with higher number of links as reported by Google and AltaVista. More popular sites by number of linking sites were also more likely to provide updates on other breast cancer research, information on legislation and advocacy, and a message board service. Measures of quality such as display of authorship, attribution or references, currency of information, and disclosure did not differ between groups. Conclusions Popularity of websites is associated with type rather than quality of content Sites that include content correlated with popularity may best meet the public's desire for information about breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P AM SOC CLIN ONCOLO
  • [2] BATEMAN M, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, pA419
  • [3] Health information on the Internet -: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish
    Berland, GK
    Elliott, MN
    Morales, LS
    Algazy, JI
    Kravitz, RL
    Broder, MS
    Kanouse, DE
    Muñoz, JA
    Puyol, JA
    Lara, M
    Watkins, KE
    Yang, H
    McGlynn, EA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20): : 2612 - 2621
  • [4] Melanoma information on the Internet: Often incomplete - A public health opportunity?
    Bichakjian, CK
    Schwartz, JL
    Wang, TS
    Hall, JM
    Johnson, TM
    Biermann, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) : 134 - 141
  • [5] The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
    Brin, S
    Page, L
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS, 1998, 30 (1-7): : 107 - 117
  • [6] Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information
    Eysenbach, G
    Diepgen, TL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7171) : 1496 - 1500
  • [7] HELFT PR, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA633
  • [8] *HLTH NET FDN, 2001, HON COD COND HONC ME
  • [9] Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web
    Hoffman-Goetz, L
    Clarke, JN
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2000, 91 (04): : 281 - 284
  • [10] Rating health information on the Internet - Navigating to knowledge or to Babel?
    Jadad, AR
    Gagliardi, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (08): : 611 - 614