Evaluation of a single dose of half strength inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults

被引:56
作者
Treanor, J
Keitel, W
Belshe, R
Campbell, J
Schiff, G
Zangwill, K
Wolff, M
Klimov, A
Levandowski, R
Lambert, L
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Infect Dis Unit, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp, Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Vaccine Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] EMMES Corp, Rockville, MD USA
[8] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[9] US FDA, Bethesda, MD 20014 USA
[10] NIAID, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
influenza vaccine; healthy adults; dose response;
D O I
10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00440-6
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Because of delays in the manufacturing of the 2000-2001, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in the US, there were concerns that there might be shortages of vaccine supply in the US, Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial at six C academic medical centers in the US, to evaluate the immunogenicity of a half dose of inactivated vaccine in healthy adults. Healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 49 were randomized to receive either a full 0.5 ml (15.5 mug of each HA antigen) dose or a 0.25 ml (7.75 mug of each HA antigen) dose of the 2000-2001 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine by intramuscular injection. Sera were obtained for assessment of hemagglutination-inhibiting antibody to each of the three strains contained in the vaccine before and 21 days after vaccination. The proportions of individuals achieving a post-vaccination titer of greater than or equal to1:40, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of post-vaccination antibody, and the proportions of individuals with a four-fold or greater increase in antibody were lower for all three strains in those receiving 0.25 ml of vaccine compared to those receiving 0.5 ml. However, the differences were small for all three antigens. The upper 95% confidence limits for differences between 0.25 and 0.5 ml doses were less than 20% for rates of achieving a titer of greater than or equal to1:40 and four-fold response, and less than 1.5 for the ratios of GMTs between dose groups, for all three vaccine antigens. These results suggest that when vaccine is in short supply, a strategy using a half dose in healthy adults could increase the number of people vaccinated with relatively little adverse impact on vaccine immunogenicity. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1105
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MMWR Recomm Rep, V49, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE
[3]  
CATE TR, 1983, REV INFECT DIS, V5, P737
[4]   SERUM AND NASAL WASH ANTIBODIES ASSOCIATED WITH RESISTANCE TO EXPERIMENTAL CHALLENGE WITH INFLUENZA-A WILD-TYPE VIRUS [J].
CLEMENTS, ML ;
BETTS, RF ;
TIERNEY, EL ;
MURPHY, BR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 24 (01) :157-160
[5]   EFFICACY OF SEQUENTIAL ANNUAL VACCINATION WITH INACTIVATED INFLUENZA-VIRUS VACCINE [J].
KEITEL, WA ;
CATE, TR ;
COUCH, RB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 127 (02) :353-364
[6]   HIGH-DOSES OF PURIFIED INFLUENZA-A VIRUS HEMAGGLUTININ SIGNIFICANTLY AUGMENT SERUM AND NASAL SECRETION ANTIBODY-RESPONSES IN HEALTHY-YOUNG ADULTS [J].
KEITEL, WA ;
COUCH, RB ;
CATE, TR ;
HESS, KR ;
BAXTER, B ;
QUARLES, JM ;
ATMAR, RL ;
SIX, HR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (10) :2468-2473
[7]  
LAMONTAGNE JR, 1983, REV INFECT DIS, V5, P723
[8]   ANTIBODY-RESPONSE AFTER INFLUENZA IMMUNIZATION WITH VARIOUS VACCINE DOSES - A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER, DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY IN ELDERLY NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS AND YOUNG VOLUNTEERS [J].
PALACHE, AM ;
BEYER, WEP ;
SPRENGER, MJW ;
MASUREL, N ;
DEJONGE, S ;
VARDY, A ;
CHARPENTIER, B ;
NOURY, J ;
VANBEEK, WCA ;
BORST, RJA ;
LIGTHART, GJ ;
KEREN, G ;
RUBINSTEIN, E .
VACCINE, 1993, 11 (01) :3-9
[9]   INFLUENZA VACCINES - THE EFFECT OF VACCINE DOSE ON ANTIBODY-RESPONSE IN PRIMED POPULATIONS DURING THE ONGOING INTERPANDEMIC PERIOD - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
PALACHE, AM ;
BEYER, WEP ;
LUCHTERS, G ;
VOLKER, R ;
SPRENGER, MJW ;
MASUREL, N .
VACCINE, 1993, 11 (09) :892-908
[10]  
QUINNAN GV, 1983, REV INFECT DIS, V5, P748