Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among veterans

被引:29
作者
Wolf, MS
Fitzner, KA
Powell, EF
McCaffrey, KR
Pickard, AS
McKoy, JM
Lindenberg, J
Schumock, GT
Carson, KR
Ferreira, MR
Dolan, NC
Bennett, CL
机构
[1] Jesse Brown Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Lakeside Community Based Outpatient Clin, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Ctr Pharmacoecon Res, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Inst Healthcare Studies, Dept Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Dept Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[7] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Geriatr Med, Dept Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[8] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[9] Univ Illinois, Dis Management Assoc Amer, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[10] Univ Illinois, Vet Affairs Mid West Ctr Hlth Serv & Policy Res, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6278
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Colorectal cancer screening is underused, particularly in the Veterans Affairs (VA) population. In a randomized controlled trial, a health care provider-directed intervention that offered quarterly feedback to physicians on their patients' colorectal cancer screening rates led to a 9% increase in colorectal cancer screening rates among veterans. The objective of this secondary analysis was to assess the cost effectiveness of the colorectal cancer screening promotion intervention. Methods Providers in the intervention arm attended an educational workshop on colorectal cancer screening and received confidential feedback on individual and group-specific colorectal cancer screening rates. The primary end point was completion of colorectal cancer screening tests. Sensitivity analyses investigated cost-effectiveness estimates varying the data collection methods, costs of labor and technology, and the effectiveness of the intervention. Results Rates of colorectal cancer screening for the intervention versus control arms were 41.3% v 32.4%, respectively (P < .05). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $978 per additional veteran screened based on feedback reports generated from manual review of records. However, if feedback reports could be generated from information technology systems, sensitivity analyses indicate that the cost-effectiveness estimate would decrease to $196 per additional veteran screened. Conclusion An intervention based on quarterly feedback reports to physicians improved colorectal cancer screening rates at a VA medical center. This intervention would be cost effective if relevant data could be generated by existing information technology systems. Our findings may have broad applicability because a 2005 Medicare initiative will provide the VA electronic medical record system as a free benefit to all US physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:8877 / 8883
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2005, COL CANC FACTS FIG
[2]   Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion [J].
Andersen, MR ;
Urban, N ;
Ramsey, S ;
Briss, PA .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (05) :1229-1238
[3]  
Andersen MR, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P314
[4]   Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities [J].
Andersen, MR ;
Hager, M ;
Su, C ;
Urban, N .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2002, 29 (06) :755-770
[5]   The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer [J].
Andersen, MR ;
Urban, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (11) :1713-1715
[6]   Administrative data feedback for effective cardiac treatment - AFFECT, a cluster randomized trial [J].
Beek, CA ;
Richard, H ;
Tu, JV ;
Pilote, L .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (03) :309-317
[7]   Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, PS ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (02) :129-131
[8]   DEMOGRAPHIC-PREDICTORS OF MAMMOGRAPHY AND PAP SMEAR SCREENING IN UNITED-STATES WOMEN [J].
CALLE, EE ;
FLANDERS, WD ;
THUN, MJ ;
MARTIN, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :53-60
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P193
[10]   Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care - Results from the VA cooperative study on computerized reminders [J].
Demakis, JG ;
Beauchamp, C ;
Cull, WL ;
Denwood, R ;
Eisen, SA ;
Lofgren, R ;
Nichol, K ;
Woolliscroft, J ;
Henderson, WG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (11) :1411-1416