Supplier commitment and production decisions under a forecast-commitment contract

被引:54
作者
Durango-Cohen, EJ [1 ]
Yano, CA
机构
[1] IIT, Inst Business & Interprofessional Studies, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] IIT, Walter A Haas Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
supply contracts; information sharing; capacity allocation; quantity flexibility;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1050.0471
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Manufacturing firms in capital-intensive industries face inherent demand volatility for their products and the inability to change their capacity quickly. To cope with these challenges, manufacturers often enter into contracts with their customers that offer greater certainty of supply in return for more predictable orders. In this paper, we study a "forecast-commitment" contract in which the customer provides a forecast, the supplier makes a production commitment to the customer based on the forecast, and the customer's minimum order quantity is a function of the forecast and committed quantities. We provide a complete analysis of the supplier's decisions when there is a single customer facing uncertain demand. We first show that the supplier has two dominant commitment strategies: committing to the forecast or committing to the production quantity. We then characterize the jointly optimal commitment and production strategy for the supplier and extend the results to consider a capacity constraint. We show that the proposed contract can moderate the supplier's motivation to underproduce, and due to the structure of the contract and the form of the supplier's optimal strategy, also limits the customer's incentive to overforecast. We also provide results for a capacitated two-customer example, which show that the supplier's choice of production quantity for each customer is not necessarily nondecreasing in the total available capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 67
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Approximations for multiproduct contracts with stochastic demands and business volume discounts: single supplier case [J].
Anupindi, R ;
Bassok, Y .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1998, 30 (08) :723-734
[2]  
Anupindi R., 1999, QUANTITATIVE MODELS, P197
[3]  
Barnes-Schuster D., 2002, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V4, P171, DOI 10.1287/msom.4.3.171.7754
[4]   Design of component-supply contract with commitment-revision flexibility [J].
Bassok, Y ;
Bixby, A ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Wiesel, HZ .
IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 41 (06) :693-703
[5]   Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment [J].
Bassok, Y ;
Anupindi, R .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1997, 29 (05) :373-381
[6]  
BASSOK Y, 1997, ANAL SUPPLY CONTRACT
[7]  
Brown A., 1997, OPTIMAL PAY TO DELAY
[8]  
Cachon G. P., 2002, HDB OPERATIONS RES M
[9]   Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (05) :629-646
[10]   Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (05) :685-703