Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development

被引:397
作者
Hargreaves, Tom [1 ]
Hielscher, Sabine [2 ]
Seyfang, Gill [1 ]
Smith, Adrian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Sci Soc & Sustainabil Res Grp 3S, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sci & Technol Policy Res Unit SPRU, Brighton BN1 9QE, E Sussex, England
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2013年 / 23卷 / 05期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Strategic niche management; Intermediary actors; Grassroots innovation; Community energy; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; GREEN NICHES; MANAGEMENT; REGIME; TRAJECTORIES; TRANSITION; POLICY; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Community energy projects are attracting increasing attention as potential sources of innovation to support sustainable energy transitions. Research into 'grassroots innovations' like community energy often recognises the difficulties they face in simply surviving let alone in growing or seeding wider change. Strategic niche management theory is potentially helpful here as it highlights the important roles played by 'intermediary actors' in consolidating, growing and diffusing novel innovations. This paper presents the first in-depth analysis of intermediary work in the UK community energy sector. New empirical evidence was gathered through interviews with 15 community energy intermediaries and a content analysis of 113 intermediary-produced case studies about community energy projects. Analysis finds intermediaries adopting a variety of methods to try and diffuse generic lessons about context-specific projects, but that trying to coordinate support for local projects that exist amidst very different social and political circumstances is challenging. This is exacerbated by the challenges of building a coherent institutional infrastructure for a sector where aims and approaches diverge, and where underlying resources are uncertain and inconsistent. Applications of relatively simple, growth-oriented approaches like strategic niche management to grassroots innovations need to be reformulated to better recognise their diverse and conflicted realities on the ground. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 880
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COMMUNITY ENERGY UK
[2]  
Avelino F., 2009, EUROPEAN C SUSTAINAB
[3]   Doing reflexive modernization in pig husbandry - The hard work of changing the course of a river [J].
Bos, Bram ;
Grin, John .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2008, 33 (04) :480-507
[4]  
Communities and Climate Action Alliance, 2011, KEY ISS AR COMM CLIM
[5]  
Community Energy Scotland, 2009, COMM REN EN TOOLK
[6]  
Elzen B., 2004, SYSTEM INNOVATION TR
[7]   Normative contestation in transitions 'in the making': Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry [J].
Elzen, Boelie ;
Geels, Frank W. ;
Leeuwis, Cees ;
van Mierlo, Barbara .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (02) :263-275
[8]   Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945-1986) [J].
Geels, F. W. ;
Verhees, B. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (06) :910-930
[9]   Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973-2003) [J].
Geels, Frank ;
Raven, Rob .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) :375-392
[10]  
Geels Frank., 2006, Science and Public Policy, V33, P265, DOI [10.3152/147154306781778984, DOI 10.3152/147154306781778984]