CDT, GGT, and AST as markers of alcohol use: The WHO/ISBRA Collaborative Project

被引:102
作者
Conigrave, KM
Degenhardt, LJ
Whitfield, JB
Saunders, JB
Helander, A
Tabakoff, B
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Drug & Alcohol Dept, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Biochem, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Dept Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Natl Drug & Alcohol Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Mental Hlth Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Karolinska Hosp & Inst, Alcohol Lab, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
biological markers; diagnosis; carbohydrate deficient transferrin; gamma glutamyltransferase; biochemistry;
D O I
10.1097/00000374-200203000-00005
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Estimates of the performance of carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) as markers of alcohol consumption have varied widely. Studies have differed in design and subject characteristics. The WHO/ISBRA Collaborative Study allows assessment and comparison of CDT, GGT, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) as markers of drinking in a large, well-characterized, multicenter sample. Methods: A total of 1863 subjects were recruited from five countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland, and Japan). Recruitment was stratified by alcohol use, age, and sex. Demographic characteristics, alcohol consumption, and presence of ICD-10 dependence were recorded using an interview schedule based on the AUDADIS, CDT was assayed using CDTect(TM) and GGT and AST by standard methods. Statistical techniques included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Multiple regression was used to measure the impact of factors other than alcohol on test performance. Results: CDT and GGT had comparable performance on ROC analysis, with AST performing slightly less well. CDT was a slightly but significantly better marker of high-risk consumption in men. All were more effective for detection of high-risk rather than intermediate-risk drinking. CDT and GGT levels were influenced by body mass index, sex, age, and smoking status. Conclusions: CDT was little better than GGT in detecting high- or intermediate-risk alcohol consumption in this large, multicenter, predominantly community-based sample. As the two tests are relatively independent of each other, their combination is likely to provide better performance than either test alone, Test interpretation should take account sex, age. and body mass index.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 339
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN AS A MEASURE OF IMMODERATE DRINKING - REMAINING ISSUES [J].
ALLEN, JP ;
LITTEN, RZ ;
ANTON, RF ;
CROSS, GM .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 18 (04) :799-812
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NIH PUBL
[3]   CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN AND GAMMA-GLUTAMYL-TRANSFERASE AS MARKERS OF HEAVY ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION - GENDER DIFFERENCES [J].
ANTON, RF ;
MOAK, DH .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 18 (03) :747-754
[4]   THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF MODERATE ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
BAUMBAICKER, C .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1985, 15 (03) :207-227
[5]  
Borg S, 1996, ALCOHOL ALCOHOLISM, V31, P621
[6]  
COOMBS C.H., 1970, MATH PSYCHOL ELEMENT
[7]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[8]  
English DR., 1995, QUANTIFICATION DRUG
[9]   THE ALCOHOL-USE DISORDER AND ASSOCIATED DISABILITIES INTERVIEW SCHEDULE (AUDADIS) - RELIABILITY OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG MODULES IN A GENERAL-POPULATION SAMPLE [J].
GRANT, BF ;
HARFORD, TC ;
DAWSON, DA ;
CHOU, PS ;
PICKERING, RP .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1995, 39 (01) :37-44
[10]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ETHANOL INTAKE AND DSM-III-R ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE [J].
GRANT, BF ;
HARFORD, TC .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1990, 51 (05) :448-456