Hypoxia and glucose metabolism in malignant tumors:: Evaluation by [18F]fluoromisonidazole and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging

被引:317
作者
Rajendran, JG
Mankoff, DA
O'Sullivan, F
Peterson, LM
Schwartz, DL
Conrad, EU
Spence, AM
Muzi, M
Farwell, DG
Krohn, KA
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Div Nucl Med, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Div Nucl Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Nucl Med, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Div Nucl Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Div Nucl Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Vet Adm, Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Coll Cork, Cork, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0688-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare glucose metabolism and hypoxia in four different tumor types using positron emission tomography (PET). F-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) evaluates energy metabolism, whereas the uptake of F-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) is proportional to tissue hypoxia. Although acute hypoxia results in accelerated glycolysis, cellular metabolism is slowed in chronic hypoxia, prompting us to look for discordance between FMISO and FDG uptake. Experimental Design: Forty-nine patients (26 with head and neck cancer, 11 with soft tissue sarcoma, 7 with breast cancer, and 5 with glioblastoma multiforme) who had both FMISO and FDG PET scans as part of research protocols through February 2003 were included in this study. The maximum standardized uptake value was used to depict FDG uptake, and hypoxic volume and maximum tissue: blood ratio were used to quantify hypoxia. Pixel-by-pixel correlation of radiotracer uptake was performed on coregistered images for each corresponding tumor plane. Results: Hypoxia was detected in all four patient groups. The mean correlation coefficients between FMISO and FDG uptake were 0.62 for head and neck cancer, 0.47 for breast cancer, 0.38 for glioblastoma multiforme, and 0.32 for soft tissue sarcoma. The correlation between the overall tumor maximum standardized uptake value for FDG and hypoxic volume was small (Spearman r = 0.24), with highly significant differences among the different tumor types (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Hypoxia is a general factor affecting glucose metabolism; however, some hypoxic tumors can have modest glucose metabolism, whereas some highly metabolic tumors are not hypoxic, showing discordance in tracer uptake that can be tumor type specific.
引用
收藏
页码:2245 / 2252
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Adam MF, 1999, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V21, P146, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199903)21:2<146::AID-HED8>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-U
[3]   Feasibility of detecting hypoxia in experimental mouse tumours with 18F-fluorinated tracers and positron emission tomography -: A study evaluating [18F]fluoromisonidazole and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose [J].
Bentzen, L ;
Keiding, S ;
Horsman, MR ;
Falborg, L ;
Hansen, SB ;
Overgaard, J .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2000, 39 (05) :629-637
[4]   Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography [J].
Bos, R ;
van der Hoeven, JJM ;
van der Wall, E ;
van der Groep, P ;
van Diest, PJ ;
Comans, EFI ;
Joshi, U ;
Semenza, GL ;
Hoekstra, OS ;
Lammertsma, AA ;
Molthoff, CFM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) :379-387
[5]   Tumor hypoxia adversely affects the prognosis of carcinoma of the head and neck [J].
Brizel, DM ;
Sibley, GS ;
Prosnitz, LR ;
Scher, RL ;
Dewhirst, MW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (02) :285-289
[6]   PRETREATMENT OXYGENATION PROFILES OF HUMAN SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS [J].
BRIZEL, DM ;
ROSNER, GL ;
HARRELSON, J ;
PROSNITZ, LR ;
DEWHIRST, MW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (03) :635-642
[7]  
Brown JM, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P5863
[8]   Exploiting the hypoxic cancer cell: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies [J].
Brown, JM .
MOLECULAR MEDICINE TODAY, 2000, 6 (04) :157-162
[9]  
Burgman P, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P170
[10]  
Chao KSC, 2000, INT J CANCER, V90, P92, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000420)90:2<92::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO