Optimised in vitro applicable loads for the simulation of lateral bending in the lumbar spine

被引:31
作者
Dreischarf, Marcel [1 ]
Rohlmann, Antonius [1 ]
Bergmann, Georg [1 ]
Zander, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Julius Wolff Inst, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Lumbar spine; Load application mode; Lateral bending; Finite element analysis; Optimisation study; FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL; MOTION SEGMENT; AXIAL ROTATION; MUSCLE FORCES; COMPRESSION; EXTENSION; STABILITY; FLEXION; VIVO;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.04.002
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
In in vitro studies of the lumbar spine simplified loading modes (compressive follower force, pure moment) are usually employed to simulate the standard load cases flexion-extension, axial rotation and lateral bending of the upper body. However, the magnitudes of these loads vary widely in the literature. Thus the results of current studies may lead to unrealistic values and are hardly comparable. It is still unknown which load magnitudes lead to a realistic simulation of maximum lateral bending. A validated finite element model of the lumbar spine was used in an optimisation study to determine which magnitudes of the compressive follower force and bending moment deliver results that fit best with averaged in vivo data. The best agreement with averaged in vivo measured data was found for a compressive follower force of 700 N and a lateral bending moment of 7.8 N m. These results show that loading modes that differ strongly from the optimised one may not realistically simulate maximum lateral bending. The simplified but in vitro applicable loading cannot perfectly mimic the in vivo situation. However, the optimised magnitudes are those which agree best with averaged in vivo measured data. Its consequent application would lead to a better comparability of different investigations. (C) 2012 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 780
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Optimised loads for the simulation of axial rotation in the lumbar spine [J].
Dreischarf, Marcel ;
Rohlmann, Antonius ;
Bergmann, Georg ;
Zander, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2011, 44 (12) :2323-2327
[2]
A non-optimized follower load path may cause considerable intervertebral rotations [J].
Dreischarf, Marcel ;
Zander, Thomas ;
Bergmann, Georg ;
Rohlmann, Antonius .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 43 (13) :2625-2628
[3]
DVORAK J, 1991, SPINE, V16, P562
[4]
Eberlein R., 2001, COMPUT METHOD BIOMEC, V4, P209, DOI [10.1080/10255840108908005, DOI 10.1080/10255840108908005]
[5]
Meyers Kathleen N, 2007, HSS J, V3, P164, DOI 10.1007/s11420-007-9049-0
[6]
A two-cage reconstruction versus a single mega-cage reconstruction for lumbar interbody fusion: an experimental comparison [J].
Murakami, H ;
Horton, WC ;
Tomita, K ;
Hutton, WC .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2004, 13 (05) :432-440
[7]
NACHEMSON A, 1975, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, V14, P129
[8]
NOLTE LP, 1990, ADV BIOMAT, V9, P663
[9]
A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression [J].
Patwardhan, AG ;
Havey, RM ;
Meade, KP ;
Lee, B ;
Dunlap, B .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (10) :1003-1009
[10]
AXIAL ROTATION AND LATERAL BENDING IN THE NORMAL LUMBAR SPINE MEASURED BY 3-DIMENSIONAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
PEARCY, MJ ;
TIBREWAL, SB .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (06) :582-587