Long-term follow-up of patients of intrahepatic malignancies treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy

被引:150
作者
Nag, S
DeHaan, M
Scruggs, G
Mayr, N
Martin, EW
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiat Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Div Surg Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 64卷 / 03期
关键词
brachytherapy; I-125; liver metastases; colorectal cancer; cholangiocarcinoma;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.029
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: We investigated the role of intraoperative iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy as a treatment option for unresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors. Methods and Materials: Between 1989 and 2002, 64 patients with unresectable or residual disease after surgical resection for intrahepatic malignancies underwent 160-Gy permanent I-125 brachytherapy. Results: The median length of follow-up was 13.2 years. The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year actuarial intrahepatic local control rates were 44%, 22%, and 22%, respectively, with a median time to liver recurrence of 9 months (95% CI, 6-12 months). The 5-year actuarial intrahepatic control was higher for patients with solitary metastasis (38%) than for those with multiple metastases (6%, p = 0.04). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year actuarial overall survival rates were 73%, 23%, and 5%, respectively (median, 20 months; 95% CI, 16-24; longest survival, 7.5 years). Overall survival was higher for patients with smaller-volume implants (p = 0.003) and for patients without prior liver resection (p = 0.002). No mortality occurred. Radiation-related complications were minimal. Conclusions: For select patients with unresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors for whom curative surgical resection is not an option, I-125 brachytherapy is a safe and effective alternative to other locally ablative techniques and can provide long-term local control and increased survival. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 744
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]
ANDERSON L L, 1976, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V3, P48, DOI 10.1118/1.594269
[2]
[Anonymous], HIGH DOSE RATE BRACH
[3]
ARMSTRONG JG, 1994, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V73, P1800, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940401)73:7<1800::AID-CNCR2820730705>3.0.CO
[4]
2-E
[5]
Determinants of survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Bakalakos, EA ;
Kim, JA ;
Young, DC ;
Martin, EW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 22 (04) :399-405
[6]
Belli Giulio, 2002, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, V9, P607, DOI 10.1007/s005340200082
[7]
Treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: what is the best approach today? [J].
Biasco, G ;
Gallerani, E .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2001, 33 (05) :438-444
[8]
Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis - A critical and improvable determinant of outcome [J].
Cady, B ;
Jenkins, RL ;
Steele, GD ;
Lewis, WD ;
Stone, MD ;
McDermott, WV ;
Jessup, JM ;
Bothe, A ;
Lalor, P ;
Lovett, EJ ;
Lavin, P ;
Linehan, DC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) :566-571
[9]
CADY B, 1983, SEMIN ONCOL, V10, P127
[10]
CHERQUI D, 1995, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V130, P1073