Dual Source Computed Tomography: A Novel Technique to Determine Stone Composition

被引:87
作者
Matlaga, Brian R. [1 ]
Kawamoto, Satomi [1 ]
Fishman, Elliot [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21209 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION Dual source computed tomography (CT), a novel technology that employs two different x-ray sources, may provide an image resolution that has not been possible with conventional single source CT. We tested the ability of dual source CT imaging to distinguish calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones from calcium phosphate (CaP) stones, and both types of calciferous stones from uric acid (UA) stones. METHODS CaOx, CaP, and UA stones were placed in a tissue phantom and imaged with dual source multidetector CT at both 80kV and 140 kV. Hounsfield units (HU) of each stone were recorded for the 140 kV and the 80 kV datasets by drawing regions of interest by circle, hand-drawing, and using a volume calculation method. The differences between, and the ratios of, the HU obtained by the two energy sources were compared among the stone groups. RESULTS Between CaOx and CaP stones, HU differences (80kV-140kV difference, hand-drawing technique: CaOx = 270.7; Cal? = 369.5; UA = 11.45; P = 0.020 for CaOx vs. CaP; P < 0.001 for CaOx and Cap vs. UA) as well as ratios (140kV:80kV ratio, hand-drawing technique: CaOx = 1.44; CaP = 1.51; UA = 1.04; P = 0.001 for CaOx vs. CaP; P < 0.001 for CaOx and CaP vs. UA) were significantly different. There were no significant differences in stone size among the groups. CONCLUSIONS Dual source CT has the ability to distinguish not only between calciferous stones and uric acid stones, but also among stones composed of different calcium salts. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings in a clinical setting. UROLOGY 72: 1164-1168, 2008. (C) 2008 Elsevier, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1168
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density [J].
Bellin, MF ;
Renard-Penna, R ;
Conort, P ;
Bissery, A ;
Meric, JB ;
Daudon, M ;
Mallet, A ;
Richard, F ;
Grenier, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (11) :2134-2140
[2]   The efficacy of non-contrast helical computed tomography in the prediction of urinary stone composition in vivo [J].
Demirel, A ;
Suma, S .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (01) :1-5
[3]   First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system [J].
Flohr, TG ;
McCollough, CH ;
Bruder, H ;
Petersilka, M ;
Gruber, K ;
Süss, C ;
Grasruck, M ;
Stierstorfer, K ;
Krauss, B ;
Raupach, R ;
Primak, AN ;
Küttner, A ;
Achenbach, S ;
Becker, C ;
Kopp, A ;
Ohnesorge, BM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) :256-268
[4]   Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: Review of all imaging modalities [J].
Heidenreich, A ;
Desgrandschamps, F ;
Terrier, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (04) :351-362
[5]  
KUWAHARA M, 1984, UROL RES, V12, P111
[6]   The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents - X-ray attenuation [J].
McKetty, MH .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (01) :151-163
[7]   DETERMINATION OF THE CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF URINARY CALCULI BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
MITCHESON, HD ;
ZAMENHOF, RG ;
BANKOFF, MS ;
PRIEN, EL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (04) :814-819
[8]   Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography [J].
Mostafavi, MR ;
Ernst, RD ;
Saltzman, B .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :673-675
[9]   Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition [J].
Motley, G ;
Dalrymple, N ;
Keesling, C ;
Fischer, J ;
Harmon, W .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) :170-173
[10]   Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting [J].
Nakada, SY ;
Hoff, DG ;
Attai, S ;
Heisey, D ;
Blankenbaker, D ;
Pozniak, M .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (06) :816-819