A new subfamily classification of the palm family (Arecaceae): evidence from plastid DNA phylogeny

被引:153
作者
Asmussen, CB
Dransfield, J
Deickmann, V
Barfod, AS
Pintaud, JC
Baker, WJ
机构
[1] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Ecol, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Royal Bot Gardens, Herbarium, Richmond TW9 3AE, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Aarhus, Dept Biol Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[4] DYNADIV, UMR DGPC, Inst Rech Dev, F-34394 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
matK; Palmae; rbcL; rps16; intron; trnL-trnF;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00521.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Published phylogeny reconstructions of the palm family (Arecaceae) are based on plastid DNA sequences or restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), nuclear DNA sequences, morphological characters or a combination thereof, and include between 33 and 90 palm species. The present study represents all previously recognized subfamilies, tribes and subtribes of palms and 161 of the 189 genera. The plastid DNA region matK was sequenced for 178 palm species and ten commelinid monocot outgroup species, and was combined with new and previously published plastid DNA sequences of trnL-trnF, rps16 intron and rbcL. The addition of matK sequences and more taxa resulted in a highly resolved and largely well-supported phylogeny. Most importantly, critical basal nodes are now fully resolved and, in most cases, strongly supported. On the basis of this phylogeny, we have established a new subfamilial classification of the palms, in which five subfamilies are recognized, rather than the six that were included in the previous classification. The circumscriptions of the subfamilies Calamoideae and Nypoideae were corroborated. The phylogeny supported a new circumscription for the subfamily Coryphoideae, including all taxa previously recognized in Coryphoideae with the addition of the tribe Caryoteae, formerly of the subfamily Arecoideae. The phylogenetic analysis also supported a new delimitation for the subfamily Ceroxyloideae that contains the tribes Cyclospatheae and Ceroxyleae, and all genera formerly included in the subfamily Phytelephantoideae, but excludes the tribe Hyophorbeae. Finally, the subfamily Arecoideae was modified to exclude the tribe Caryoteae and to include the tribe Hyophorbeae. (c) 2006 The Linnean Society of London.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 38
页数:24
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics [J].
Asmussen, CB ;
Chase, MW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2001, 88 (06) :1103-1117
[2]  
ASMUSSEN CB, 2000, SYSTEMATICS EVOLUTIO, P525
[3]   Molecular phylogenetics of Calamus (Palmae) and related rattan genera based on 5S nrDNA spacer sequence data [J].
Baker, WJ ;
Hedderson, TA ;
Dransfield, J .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 14 (02) :218-231
[4]   Molecular phylogenetics of subfamily Calamoideae (Palmae) based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA rps16 intron sequence data [J].
Baker, WJ ;
Hedderson, TA ;
Dransfield, J .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 14 (02) :195-217
[5]   Phylogeny, character evolution, and a new classification of the calamoid palms [J].
Baker, WJ ;
Dransfield, J ;
Hedderson, TA .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 2000, 25 (02) :297-322
[6]   A phylogenetic study of the palm family (Palmae) based on chloroplast DNA sequences from the trnL-trnF region [J].
Baker, WJ ;
Asmussen, CB ;
Barrow, SC ;
Dransfield, J ;
Hedderson, TA .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 219 (1-2) :111-126
[7]  
BAKER WJ, 2004, KEW B, V59, P61, DOI DOI 10.2307/4111074
[8]  
Barfod, 1991, OPERA BOT, V105, P1
[9]  
Chase M.W., 2000, Monocots: Systematics and evolution, P3
[10]  
Doyle J. L., 1987, Phytochemical Bulletin, V19, P11, DOI 10.2307/4119796