Two kinds of items in quality of life instruments: 'Indicator and causal variables' in the EORTC QLQ-C30

被引:34
作者
Boehmer, S
Luszczynska, A
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Hlth Psychol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Life Sci, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[3] Warsaw Sch Social Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
cancer; causal variables; construct validity; factor analysis; indicator variables; quality of life instruments;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-005-8290-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two kinds of variables may be differentiated within instruments measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Physical symptoms may be called causal variables because their occurrence can cause a change in HRQOL, but poor HRQOL need not necessarily imply that a patient suffers from these symptoms. Other items can be regarded as indicator variables. They reflect the level of HRQOL and a patient with a poor HRQOL is likely to have low scores on all indicator variables. The aim of this study was to test the relationship of the latent HRQOL construct to items and domains on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on EORTC QLQ-C30 data from 205 gastrointestinal cancer patients assessed one month after surgery. Functioning scales were established as variables indicating the level of HRQOL whereas all other subscales and items were established as variables causing a change in HRQOL. The model-data fit was satisfactory. Results support the hypothesis that two kinds of variables may be differentiated within HRQOL instruments. Further research should investigate whether both kinds of variables could be combined into a higher order, aggregate score for HRQOL.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
ARBUCKLE JL, 1999, AMOS 4 0 US GUID
[3]  
BOLLEN KA, 1908, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[4]   The theoretical status of latent variables [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :203-219
[5]   Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains [J].
Browne, JP ;
OBoyle, CA ;
McGee, HM ;
McDonald, NJ ;
Joyce, CRB .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (04) :301-309
[6]  
Browne M., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[7]  
Chou C., 1995, Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, P37, DOI DOI 10.2307/2988418
[8]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - CAN WE KEEP IT SIMPLE [J].
COX, DR ;
FITZPATRICK, R ;
FLETCHER, AE ;
GORE, SM ;
SPIEGELHALTER, DJ ;
JONES, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1992, 155 :353-393
[9]  
Fayers P, 1995, EORTC QLQ C30 SCORIN
[10]   Causal indicators in quality of life research [J].
Fayers, PM ;
Hand, DJ ;
Bjordal, K ;
Groenvold, M .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (05) :393-406