Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised trial of acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care

被引:91
作者
Wonderling, D
Vickers, AJ
Grieve, R
McCarney, R
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Hlth Serv Res Unit, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Biostat Serv, Integrat Med Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Psychol Med, London W2 1PD, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2004年 / 328卷 / 7442期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38033.896505.EB
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of chronic headache. Design Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Setting General practices in England and Wales. Participants 401 patients with chronic headache, predominantly migraine. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated to receive up to 12 acupuncture treatments over three months from appropriately trained physiotherapists, or to usual care alone. Main outcome measure Incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results Total costs during the one year period of the study were on average higher for the acupuncture group (1,103; $768; E598) than for controls (A:217) because of the acupuncture practitioners' costs. The mean health gain from acupuncture during the one year of the trial was 0.021 quality adjusted life years (QALYs), leading to a base case estimate of 9180 per QALY gained. This result was robust to sensitivity analysis. Cost per QALY dropped substantially when the analysis incorporated likely QALY differences for the years after the trial. Conclusions Acupuncture for chronic headache improves health related quality of life at a small additional cost; it is relatively cost effective compared with a number of other interventions provided by the NHS.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 749
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Acupuncture in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: A comparison with flunarizine [J].
Allais, G ;
De Lorenzo, C ;
Quirico, PE ;
Airola, G ;
Tolardo, G ;
Mana, O ;
Benedetto, C .
HEADACHE, 2002, 42 (09) :855-861
[2]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[3]  
BLAU JN, 1991, MIGRAINE
[4]  
BOSANQUET N, 1992, BR J MED EC, V2, P81
[5]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[6]  
CULL RE, 1992, BR J MED EC, V2, P81
[7]   Economic evaluation of oral sumatriptan compared with oral caffeine/ergotamine for migraine [J].
Evans, KW ;
Boan, JA ;
Evans, JL ;
Shuaib, A .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1997, 12 (05) :565-577
[8]   Drug therapy: Migraine - Current understanding and treatment. [J].
Goadsby, PJ ;
Lipton, RB ;
Ferrari, MD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (04) :257-270
[9]   The 'dry-needle technique':: intramuscular stimulation in tension-type headache [J].
Karakurum, B ;
Karaalin, O ;
Coskun, Ö ;
Dora, B ;
Üçler, S ;
Inan, LE .
CEPHALALGIA, 2001, 21 (08) :813-817
[10]   Pressure pain threshold and needle acupuncture in chronic tension-type headache - a double-blind placebo-controlled study [J].
Karst, M ;
Rollnik, JD ;
Fink, M ;
Reinhard, M ;
Piepenbrock, S .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (02) :199-203